of the words was calculated. Each group could get a maximum score of 104 for each post
test. Figures 7.11 and 7.12 present the results for both sets of questions.
Figure 7.11 Total number of correct responses in the “categorisation questions” by
group across testing

I I Control LJ PhO-ControI
I Oste-Definition H Lex-Contrast
і j Definition
Figure 7.12 Total number of correct responses in the “world knowledge” questions by
group across testing

Posttestl Post test 2 Post test 3
I I Control Fl Pho-Control
S Oste-Deflnltion H Lex-Contrast
I___: Definition
The previous figures show the same pattern as that shown in Table 7.11, nevertheless, to a
lower degree. In addition, comparison between the two sets of questions revealed that the
children performed significantly better in the “world knowledge" than the “categorisation"
questions across testing (Wilcoxon, Pl: Z=5.8, p<.0000; P2: Z= 4.7, p<.0000; P3: Z=8.1,
p<.0000).
Is there a differential impact of the type of exposure to new lexical items that the children
receive on their performance in the short questions task ?
Categorisation questions
Three separate One Way Analyses of Variance were carried out with group as the
independent variable and score in the categorisation questions as the dependent variables.
227
More intriguing information
1. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests2. The name is absent
3. Public Debt Management in Brazil
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
10. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act