7.4.2.2.5 Contrast task
Scoring criteria for the contrast task
Children’s knowledge was assessed for each of the four lexical items. The present task
included the question Did they provide appropriate contrasts ? For the present experiment
the contrasts were appropriate when they contrasted the target word with another from the
same semantic category. For example, appropriate contrast for the ostrich and mole was any
animal contrast, while appropriate contrast for the ladle was any cutlery contrast and for the
stool any furniture contrast. Responses were scored as correct and incorrect. Provision of
appropriate contrasts was scored as correct, while failure to provide appropriate contrasts
was scored as incorrect. Each child could score from 0-4. Qualitative analysis of children’s
contrasts was also carried out.
Analysis
More than half of the children provided appropriate contrasts for the target words across
testing. By considering children from each group, there were 104 responses if they provided
contrasts for all the four target words. Figure 7.28 shows that the Lexical contrast group
provided more contrasts than the other groups during post test 2 and 3, while no significant
differences were found during post test 1.
Figure 7.28 Total number of correct responses in the contrast task by group across
testing

H Oste-Definition I Le.Contrast
∣ ∣ Definition
252
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. News Not Noise: Socially Aware Information Filtering
3. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
4. The name is absent
5. EMU: some unanswered questions
6. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
7. The name is absent
8. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent