groups. No significant differences were found for the provision of any type of
contrast over time.
► Furthermore, no significant differences were found for the provision of animal
contrasts by children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items. On the other hand,
children provided more cutlery contrasts for the unknown than the partially
represented words (because ladle was an unknown word) and more furniture contrasts
for the partially represented than the unknown words (because stool was a partially
represented word). Lastly, children provided more animal contrast for the words
describing animals than artifacts. On the other hand, they provided more cutlery and
furniture contrasts for the words describing artifacts than animals.
264
More intriguing information
1. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA2. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
3. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
4. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
5. The name is absent
6. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
7. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
8. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
9. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
10. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems