groups. No significant differences were found for the provision of any type of
contrast over time.
► Furthermore, no significant differences were found for the provision of animal
contrasts by children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items. On the other hand,
children provided more cutlery contrasts for the unknown than the partially
represented words (because ladle was an unknown word) and more furniture contrasts
for the partially represented than the unknown words (because stool was a partially
represented word). Lastly, children provided more animal contrast for the words
describing animals than artifacts. On the other hand, they provided more cutlery and
furniture contrasts for the words describing artifacts than animals.
264
More intriguing information
1. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress2. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
3. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
4. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
5. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
6. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
7. The name is absent
8. MICROWORLDS BASED ON LINEAR EQUATION SYSTEMS: A NEW APPROACH TO COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLVING AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
9. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
10. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE