groups. No significant differences were found for the provision of any type of
contrast over time.
► Furthermore, no significant differences were found for the provision of animal
contrasts by children’s prior knowledge of the lexical items. On the other hand,
children provided more cutlery contrasts for the unknown than the partially
represented words (because ladle was an unknown word) and more furniture contrasts
for the partially represented than the unknown words (because stool was a partially
represented word). Lastly, children provided more animal contrast for the words
describing animals than artifacts. On the other hand, they provided more cutlery and
furniture contrasts for the words describing artifacts than animals.
264
More intriguing information
1. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture2. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
3. The name is absent
4. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
5. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
6. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
7. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
8. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
9. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
10. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates