NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



correlated with their performance on the naming task across testing. Furthermore, it was
found that children’s existing receptive vocabulary knowledge was correlated with
performance on the multiple choice task across testing but not with performance on the
naming task. Moreover, significant correlations were found between children’s performance
on the naming, analogy and contrast tasks during the Immediate post test. Nevertheless,
correlation does not mean causation. It would be very interesting to investigate, in a future
research, which predictors predict performance in which tasks using a regression analysis,
something that was not applicable in the present research because of the nature of the data.

The same pattern was found in Experiment 2. Particularly, it was demonstrated that
comprehension and production were correlated significantly with one another. It was also
shown that the prior lexical knowledge (receptive and expressive) correlated with
performance on the multiple choice and naming task across testing. Furthermore, during
post test 1, performance on the naming task was correlated with performance on the “world
knowledge questions” task; during post test 2, performance on the naming task was correlated
with performance on the contrast, definition, categorisation questions and story generation
tasks. Lastly, during post test 3, children’s performance on the naming task was significantly
correlated with their performance on all the other tasks.

The above patterns indicate that it is not that easy to claim with certainty that comprehension
and production are two different processes, for two reasons. First, significant relations
between performance on the comprehension and production tasks were found. Secondly,
significant correlations between children’s existing vocabulary knowledge and performance
on the multiple choice and naming task were also identified. The last finding could probably
imply that comprehension and production may not require such different prerequisites.

A final suggestion could be that comprehension and production may be distinct to a certain
level (performance level) and interrelated at the same time. This suggestion could be related
with Donaldson and Laing’s (1993) claim who suggest that “a better understanding of
language development entails establishing how production and comprehension inter-relate”
(p.177).

314



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
3. Implementation of Rule Based Algorithm for Sandhi-Vicheda Of Compound Hindi Words
4. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
5. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
6. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
7. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
8. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY
9. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
10. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
11. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
12. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
13. The name is absent
14. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
18. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
19. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
20. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.