Table 2 Number of upper pairs required as OPT, 1996-2000 (% by partner country)
Albania Romania Bulgaria Ungheria Polonia Jugoslavia Croazia Ucraina Slovacchia Bosnia Erz. Others Total % on Italy
|
Barletta |
1996 |
96,90% 86,05% 92,65% 100,00% 93,56% |
7,40% 7,31% 0,00% 5,73%_________________ |
3,10% 6,55% |
0,04% 0,72%__________ |
100% 100% 100% 100% _______________100% |
8,27% | |||||||
|
1997 1998 1999 2000 | ||||||||||||||
|
Lecce |
1996 |
66,10% |
14,36% |
17,65% |
0,16% |
1,72% |
100% |
45,43% | ||||||
|
1997 |
80,55% |
7,29% |
12,15% |
100% |
21,80% | |||||||||
|
1998 |
73,44% |
2,95% |
23,61% |
100% |
8,75% | |||||||||
|
1999 |
90,81% |
4,60% |
4,60% |
100% |
15,55% | |||||||||
|
2000 |
86,19% |
7,44% |
6,37% |
100% |
20,25% | |||||||||
|
Brenta |
1996 |
58,23% |
9,94% |
13,18% |
14,92% |
3,73% |
100% |
3,75% | ||||||
|
1997 |
64,64% |
13,76% |
7,93% |
0,79% |
11,89% |
0,99% |
100% |
8,91% | ||||||
|
1998 |
69,75% |
14,53% |
1,18% |
14,53% |
100% |
5,69% | ||||||||
|
1999 |
87,19% |
11,59% |
1,22% |
100% |
7,30% | |||||||||
|
2000 |
92,88% |
0,19% |
1,04% |
4,72% |
1,18% |
100% |
7,61% | |||||||
|
Treviso |
1996 |
1,55% |
12,31% |
36,92% |
36,92% |
1,48% |
10,83% 100% |
3,79% | ||||||
|
1997 |
18,18% |
56,25% |
25,57% |
100% |
0,31% | |||||||||
|
1998 |
86,73% |
2,03% |
10,66% |
0,58% |
100% |
7,13% | ||||||||
|
1999 |
71,55% |
6,01% |
22,27% |
0,17% |
100% |
10,23% | ||||||||
|
2000 |
38,54% |
29,34% |
5,14% |
14,39% |
12,59%100% |
1,40% | ||||||||
|
Verona |
1996 |
77,34% |
15,63% |
3,25% |
0,84% |
2,94% |
100% |
1,49% | ||||||
|
1997 |
75,46% |
10,61% |
6,13% |
3,55% |
1,28% |
2,96% |
100% |
9,65% | ||||||
|
1998 |
62,43% |
12,59% |
6,71% |
1,31% |
5,82% |
10,61% |
0,52% |
100% |
19,69% | |||||
|
1999 |
81,81% |
0,59% |
5,54% |
3,27% |
3,27% |
5,52% |
100% |
15,04% | ||||||
|
2000 |
74,57% |
3,99% |
2,55% |
2,22% |
3,05% |
3,21% |
4,16% |
6,26% |
100% |
25,89% | ||||
|
Fermano |
1996 |
10,43% |
21,34% |
37,17% |
13,32% |
5,04% |
1,20% |
5,16% |
6,35% |
100% |
7,78% | |||
|
Maceratese 1997 |
14,95% |
34,79% |
11,07% |
17,97% |
5,21% |
4,30% |
3,91% |
4,17% |
1,69% |
1,95% |
100% |
13,57% | ||
|
1998 |
3,77% |
37,02% |
38,85% |
13,54% |
0,88% |
1,82% |
1,77% |
2,35% |
100% |
17,55% | ||||
|
1999 |
22,75% |
54,37% |
6,93% |
9,71% |
4,85% |
1,39% |
100% |
6,44% | ||||||
|
2000 |
7,14% |
29,49% |
54,52% |
8,85% |
100% |
7,30% | ||||||||
Source: elaborated on OPT data from ANCI (2001)
12
More intriguing information
1. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen2. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
3. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
4. The name is absent
5. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
6. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
7. The name is absent
8. Transfer from primary school to secondary school
9. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
10. The name is absent