TABLE 2
Estimation results of hedonic price model
|
Variables |
COEFFICIENTS |
T- |
PROB. T-STAT |
STANDARDIZED |
|
CONSTANT |
11.4431 |
236.8905 |
0.0000 |
- |
|
SURFACE AREA |
0.0044 |
14.0600 |
0.0000 |
0.7237 |
|
(SURFACE AREA)2 |
-2.99E-06 |
-6.4759 |
0.0000 |
-0.3530 |
|
NUMBER OF ROOMS |
0.0235 |
2.5089 |
0.0122 |
0.0506 |
|
NUMBER OF BATHROOMS |
0.1720 |
5.8588 |
0.0000 |
0.2871 |
|
(NUMBER OF BATHROOMS)2 |
-0.0141 |
-2.1521 |
0.0315 |
-0.1265 |
|
AGE OF THE BUILDING |
-0.0025 |
-3.1471 |
0.0017 |
-0.0603 |
|
FLOORS |
-0.0103 |
-5.2621 |
0.0000 |
-0.0627 |
|
DISTRICT2 |
0.1430 |
4.6906 |
0.0000 |
0.0703 |
|
DISTRICT4 |
-0.0308 |
-2.1053 |
0.0354 |
-0.0221 |
|
DISTRICT5 |
-0.1581 |
-6.1784 |
0.0000 |
-0.0687 |
|
DISTRICT6 |
-0.0462 |
-3.2302 |
0.0013 |
-0.0372 |
|
DISTRICT7 |
-0.0338 |
-2.0636 |
0.0392 |
-0.0233 |
|
DISTRICT10 |
0.0334 |
1.6728 |
0.0945 |
0.0230 |
|
DISTANCE TO DOWNTOWN |
0.0699 |
4.6526 |
0.0000 |
0.0523 |
|
PROXIMITY TO THE SEASIDE |
0.1266 |
7.2538 |
0.0000 |
0.0931 |
|
APARTMENT/STUDIO |
-0.0858 |
-2.2651 |
0.0236 |
-0.0273 |
|
DETACHED HOUSE |
0.5215 |
3.0785 |
0.0021 |
0.0622 |
|
ATTIC FLAT |
0.0781 |
1.7948 |
0.0728 |
0.0198 |
|
NEW |
0.0406 |
2.5225 |
0.0117 |
0.0320 |
|
NEEDING REFURBISHING |
-0.0948 |
-6.4510 |
0.0000 |
-0.0587 |
|
CARETAKER |
0.0475 |
3.2322 |
0.0012 |
0.0301 |
|
ELEVATOR |
0.0469 |
3.5336 |
0.0004 |
0.0466 |
|
PRIVATE PARKING |
0.1016 |
7.0954 |
0.0000 |
0.0997 |
|
POOR NATURAL LIGHT |
-0.1777 |
-12.6367 |
0.0000 |
-0.1080 |
|
DOUBLE GLAZING |
0.0265 |
1.0787 |
0.2808 |
0.0120 |
|
BUILT-IN WARDROBES |
0.0463 |
4.7398 |
0.0000 |
0.0459 |
|
d1 |
-0.4898 |
-10.7411 |
0.0000 |
-0.1100 |
|
d2___________________________ |
___________0.4145 |
5.0281 |
0.0000 |
________0.0931 |
|
Dependent Variable R2-adjusted Regression Standard error Prob (F Statistic) Theil Coefficient |
Price (in log) 1996 0.8314 0.2034 12.2233 0.4953 352.2755 0.0000 ___________________0.0080 | |||
To evaluate the results, the calculation of the coefficients for the variables "surface area
squared" and "number of bathrooms squared", were based on the procedure carried out by
Lassibille (1994, p.115). On the other hand, the impact of dummy variables on housing prices
was calculated by applying the methodology of Halvorsen and Palmquist (1980). Once these
procedures were carried out, Table 3 shows the relevance of each variable for the estimated
More intriguing information
1. The Distribution of Income of Self-employed, Entrepreneurs and Professions as Revealed from Micro Income Tax Statistics in Germany2. The name is absent
3. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
4. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
5. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
6. The name is absent
7. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
8. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
9. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
10. Robust Econometrics