TABLE 2
Estimation results of hedonic price model
|
Variables |
COEFFICIENTS |
T- |
PROB. T-STAT |
STANDARDIZED |
|
CONSTANT |
11.4431 |
236.8905 |
0.0000 |
- |
|
SURFACE AREA |
0.0044 |
14.0600 |
0.0000 |
0.7237 |
|
(SURFACE AREA)2 |
-2.99E-06 |
-6.4759 |
0.0000 |
-0.3530 |
|
NUMBER OF ROOMS |
0.0235 |
2.5089 |
0.0122 |
0.0506 |
|
NUMBER OF BATHROOMS |
0.1720 |
5.8588 |
0.0000 |
0.2871 |
|
(NUMBER OF BATHROOMS)2 |
-0.0141 |
-2.1521 |
0.0315 |
-0.1265 |
|
AGE OF THE BUILDING |
-0.0025 |
-3.1471 |
0.0017 |
-0.0603 |
|
FLOORS |
-0.0103 |
-5.2621 |
0.0000 |
-0.0627 |
|
DISTRICT2 |
0.1430 |
4.6906 |
0.0000 |
0.0703 |
|
DISTRICT4 |
-0.0308 |
-2.1053 |
0.0354 |
-0.0221 |
|
DISTRICT5 |
-0.1581 |
-6.1784 |
0.0000 |
-0.0687 |
|
DISTRICT6 |
-0.0462 |
-3.2302 |
0.0013 |
-0.0372 |
|
DISTRICT7 |
-0.0338 |
-2.0636 |
0.0392 |
-0.0233 |
|
DISTRICT10 |
0.0334 |
1.6728 |
0.0945 |
0.0230 |
|
DISTANCE TO DOWNTOWN |
0.0699 |
4.6526 |
0.0000 |
0.0523 |
|
PROXIMITY TO THE SEASIDE |
0.1266 |
7.2538 |
0.0000 |
0.0931 |
|
APARTMENT/STUDIO |
-0.0858 |
-2.2651 |
0.0236 |
-0.0273 |
|
DETACHED HOUSE |
0.5215 |
3.0785 |
0.0021 |
0.0622 |
|
ATTIC FLAT |
0.0781 |
1.7948 |
0.0728 |
0.0198 |
|
NEW |
0.0406 |
2.5225 |
0.0117 |
0.0320 |
|
NEEDING REFURBISHING |
-0.0948 |
-6.4510 |
0.0000 |
-0.0587 |
|
CARETAKER |
0.0475 |
3.2322 |
0.0012 |
0.0301 |
|
ELEVATOR |
0.0469 |
3.5336 |
0.0004 |
0.0466 |
|
PRIVATE PARKING |
0.1016 |
7.0954 |
0.0000 |
0.0997 |
|
POOR NATURAL LIGHT |
-0.1777 |
-12.6367 |
0.0000 |
-0.1080 |
|
DOUBLE GLAZING |
0.0265 |
1.0787 |
0.2808 |
0.0120 |
|
BUILT-IN WARDROBES |
0.0463 |
4.7398 |
0.0000 |
0.0459 |
|
d1 |
-0.4898 |
-10.7411 |
0.0000 |
-0.1100 |
|
d2___________________________ |
___________0.4145 |
5.0281 |
0.0000 |
________0.0931 |
|
Dependent Variable R2-adjusted Regression Standard error Prob (F Statistic) Theil Coefficient |
Price (in log) 1996 0.8314 0.2034 12.2233 0.4953 352.2755 0.0000 ___________________0.0080 | |||
To evaluate the results, the calculation of the coefficients for the variables "surface area
squared" and "number of bathrooms squared", were based on the procedure carried out by
Lassibille (1994, p.115). On the other hand, the impact of dummy variables on housing prices
was calculated by applying the methodology of Halvorsen and Palmquist (1980). Once these
procedures were carried out, Table 3 shows the relevance of each variable for the estimated
More intriguing information
1. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time2. The name is absent
3. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
4. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
5. The name is absent
6. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
7. Explaining Growth in Dutch Agriculture: Prices, Public R&D, and Technological Change
8. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
9. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
10. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes