TABLE 2
Estimation results of hedonic price model
|
Variables |
COEFFICIENTS |
T- |
PROB. T-STAT |
STANDARDIZED |
|
CONSTANT |
11.4431 |
236.8905 |
0.0000 |
- |
|
SURFACE AREA |
0.0044 |
14.0600 |
0.0000 |
0.7237 |
|
(SURFACE AREA)2 |
-2.99E-06 |
-6.4759 |
0.0000 |
-0.3530 |
|
NUMBER OF ROOMS |
0.0235 |
2.5089 |
0.0122 |
0.0506 |
|
NUMBER OF BATHROOMS |
0.1720 |
5.8588 |
0.0000 |
0.2871 |
|
(NUMBER OF BATHROOMS)2 |
-0.0141 |
-2.1521 |
0.0315 |
-0.1265 |
|
AGE OF THE BUILDING |
-0.0025 |
-3.1471 |
0.0017 |
-0.0603 |
|
FLOORS |
-0.0103 |
-5.2621 |
0.0000 |
-0.0627 |
|
DISTRICT2 |
0.1430 |
4.6906 |
0.0000 |
0.0703 |
|
DISTRICT4 |
-0.0308 |
-2.1053 |
0.0354 |
-0.0221 |
|
DISTRICT5 |
-0.1581 |
-6.1784 |
0.0000 |
-0.0687 |
|
DISTRICT6 |
-0.0462 |
-3.2302 |
0.0013 |
-0.0372 |
|
DISTRICT7 |
-0.0338 |
-2.0636 |
0.0392 |
-0.0233 |
|
DISTRICT10 |
0.0334 |
1.6728 |
0.0945 |
0.0230 |
|
DISTANCE TO DOWNTOWN |
0.0699 |
4.6526 |
0.0000 |
0.0523 |
|
PROXIMITY TO THE SEASIDE |
0.1266 |
7.2538 |
0.0000 |
0.0931 |
|
APARTMENT/STUDIO |
-0.0858 |
-2.2651 |
0.0236 |
-0.0273 |
|
DETACHED HOUSE |
0.5215 |
3.0785 |
0.0021 |
0.0622 |
|
ATTIC FLAT |
0.0781 |
1.7948 |
0.0728 |
0.0198 |
|
NEW |
0.0406 |
2.5225 |
0.0117 |
0.0320 |
|
NEEDING REFURBISHING |
-0.0948 |
-6.4510 |
0.0000 |
-0.0587 |
|
CARETAKER |
0.0475 |
3.2322 |
0.0012 |
0.0301 |
|
ELEVATOR |
0.0469 |
3.5336 |
0.0004 |
0.0466 |
|
PRIVATE PARKING |
0.1016 |
7.0954 |
0.0000 |
0.0997 |
|
POOR NATURAL LIGHT |
-0.1777 |
-12.6367 |
0.0000 |
-0.1080 |
|
DOUBLE GLAZING |
0.0265 |
1.0787 |
0.2808 |
0.0120 |
|
BUILT-IN WARDROBES |
0.0463 |
4.7398 |
0.0000 |
0.0459 |
|
d1 |
-0.4898 |
-10.7411 |
0.0000 |
-0.1100 |
|
d2___________________________ |
___________0.4145 |
5.0281 |
0.0000 |
________0.0931 |
|
Dependent Variable R2-adjusted Regression Standard error Prob (F Statistic) Theil Coefficient |
Price (in log) 1996 0.8314 0.2034 12.2233 0.4953 352.2755 0.0000 ___________________0.0080 | |||
To evaluate the results, the calculation of the coefficients for the variables "surface area
squared" and "number of bathrooms squared", were based on the procedure carried out by
Lassibille (1994, p.115). On the other hand, the impact of dummy variables on housing prices
was calculated by applying the methodology of Halvorsen and Palmquist (1980). Once these
procedures were carried out, Table 3 shows the relevance of each variable for the estimated
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
4. The name is absent
5. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
6. Großhandel: Steigende Umsätze und schwungvolle Investitionsdynamik
7. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
8. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent