Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia



The empirical part of the paper makes use of two data sets: One was provided by the division of
‘International Balance of Payments’ at the Austrian National Bank. This data presents the results of a
survey that is conducted annually by roughly 4000 Austrian enterprises that hold at least ATS 1 million
of nominal capital.

A second data set, which is analysed in this paper, presents results of a questionnaire that was conducted
by 1700 Austrian enterprises in the summer of 1997. The enterprises were asked about their specific
motives of investment and their regional sales structure. Hence these data can verify the postulated
objectives of investment.

3. Regional and sectoral patterns of Austria’s FDI in the CEECs

The share of outward FDI-stock by GDP can measure the degree of countries’ transnationalisation. This
indicator shows that Austria's ratio is far below the average of other small OECD countries (UNCTAD,
1996, 261f.).5 However, Austria's outward FDI has improved rather quickly during the period of the
opening of the Central and Eastern European economies (see Fig.1).

Fig.1: Austria’s Outward FDI by destinations, 1989-95
(total capital, in ATS billion)

□ Others

□ Other CEECs

□ Slovenia

□ Slovakia

□ Czech Republic

□ Hungary

1989           1990           1991

1992           1993

1994           1995

For Austria this period of 'globalisation' was characterised by two new and substantial economic
developments: the pre-EU-accession period6 and the opening of Eastern European economies. Both of
them have enforced Austria's international economic activities considerably. However, the FDI-stock-
GDP ratio in 1995 was still relatively low. One of the main reasons for this low degree of
internationalisation is Austria's industry structure, especially the prevalence of SMEs. Most of this
specific Austrian economic feature can be explained only by history (see BELLAK, 1997).

In Fig.1 we can see that Austria’s FDI in OECD countries7 has increased from ATS 30.5 billion (95.6%
of total FDI) in 1989 to ATS 84.3 billion (71.4% of total FDI) in 1995. As mentioned above this was
mainly the result of Austria’s accession to the EU and will not be further discussed in this paper.



More intriguing information

1. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
2. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)
3. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
4. The name is absent
5. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
6. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
7. Who is missing from higher education?
8. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
9. The name is absent
10. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
11. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?
12. The name is absent
13. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
14. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
18. Großhandel: Steigende Umsätze und schwungvolle Investitionsdynamik
19. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
20. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?