Development |
Rationale |
Primary Effects |
Secondary Effects | |
1853 |
Department OfScience and Art |
To address perceived weakness of English workforce________________ |
Established practical training as |
Signalled academic-vocational |
1856 |
RSA provides accreditation for |
To accredit practical skills |
Skills attainments recognised |
Vocational qualifications |
1878 |
City & Guilds of London Institute |
To improve technical and |
Independent bodies control |
Voluntarism firmly built into |
ca 1903 |
London Chamber of Commerce |
To accredit commercial skills |
Business skills separated from |
Hierarchy of skills developing |
1964 |
Industrial Training Boards |
To update and improve |
National system with day |
Employers' financial |
1969 |
Haslegrove Report established BEC |
To regulate college-based |
New provider challenges 3 |
Alternative provision to |
1976 |
CGLI established Foundation |
To address needs of ROSLA pupils |
Opportunity for ‘new’ 61 |
Start of pre-vocational |
1980s |
Industrial Training Boards phased |
To replace a national system with |
Apprenticeships virtually end |
Growing need for effective |
1983 |
BTEC created by merger of BEC & TEC______________________ |
Consolidation of growing agencies |
Effective route mainly via FE |
Competition for 6th forms and |
1985 |
CPVE accredited by C&G and BTEC____________________ |
Need for alternative to academic |
Flexible course with experiential |
Concerns about disparities in |
1986 |
NCVQ established |
To regulate the many vocational |
NVQs created as competence- |
Sustained bias that applied |
1991 |
Incorporation of FE & 6lh-form |
To raise standards through |
Competition for students taking |
З-track system confirmed |
1996 |
QCA absorbs NCVQ |
To bridge the ac7voc divide at |
Central statutory regulation over |
NVQs still outside framework; |
Figure 3-5 Vocational Qualification Developments in England
t'J
40