The name is absent



626


THE. ECONOMIC JOURNAL


the expense of transportation per unit of commodity, and the
price in A being changed from pa to pa + δ, we have

a(pa ÷ 8) + ∩g(pa + δ + e)
= Fa(pa + ɛ) + Fb(pa + δ + e)

(Arts. 67 and 68.)1

We have now to enquire whether the quantity denoted by
either member of this equation is greater than the corresponding
quantity before the communication was opened ; whether the
following inequality holds :

Fa(pa + ɛ) + Fb(pa + δ + e)

>Fa(pa) + Fb(pb).

Cournot answers this question in the negative by showing that
the inequality does not hold in a particular case : namely, when
the original prices, pa pb, differ from each other, and also from the
new price in A, by only a small quantity, in which case also the
cost of transport, e, must be small, since otherwise exportation
from A to B would not take place on the removal of the barrier.
This reasoning, or that which is based on another particular
assumption, viz. δ and pb — (pa + e) small (Art. 68, Iastpar.), is
quite correct. But the assumption that e should be small leads to
an erroneous conclusion in a subsequent problem : to determine
the effect of a tax on exports or imports (Art. 70).

If p is the price of the article in the exporting country before
the imposition of the tax u, and p + δ the price after the tax, we
have, before the tax, ∩a(p) + ∩b(p + e) = Fa(p) + Fb(p + e).2
And after the tax u per unit of commodity has been imposed, we
have

Ω∙a(p + ɛ) + ʃɪb(p + δ + e + u)
= -^,a(P + δ) + Fb(p + δ +
e + u).

Cournot now proceeds to draw conclusions from the last
equation by expanding and neglecting the powers, not only of δ
and u, but also
e, above the first power. I submit that Cournot’s

ɪ For pa + δ being the price of the commodity in A, and accordingly the (net)
price which the producers in A obtain (not only for that portion of the product
which they sell in A, but also) for that portion of their product which they sell in
B at a price heightened by the cost of transport e, the quantity offered by the pro-
ducers resident in A at the (net) price pa + δ, together with the quantity offered by
the residents in B at the price pa + δ + e, is equal to the quantity demanded by
the residents in A at the price pa + δ, together with the quantity demanded by the
residents in B at the price pa + δ + e.

2 Compare the last note.



More intriguing information

1. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
2. The name is absent
3. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
4. ENERGY-RELATED INPUT DEMAND BY CROP PRODUCERS
5. The name is absent
6. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
7. The name is absent
8. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
9. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
10. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
11. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
12. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
13. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
14. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
15. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
16. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
20. The name is absent