626
THE. ECONOMIC JOURNAL
the expense of transportation per unit of commodity, and the
price in A being changed from pa to pa + δ, we have
∩a(pa ÷ 8) + ∩g(pa + δ + e)
= Fa(pa + ɛ) + Fb(pa + δ + e)
(Arts. 67 and 68.)1
We have now to enquire whether the quantity denoted by
either member of this equation is greater than the corresponding
quantity before the communication was opened ; whether the
following inequality holds :
Fa(pa + ɛ) + Fb(pa + δ + e)
>Fa(pa) + Fb(pb).
Cournot answers this question in the negative by showing that
the inequality does not hold in a particular case : namely, when
the original prices, pa pb, differ from each other, and also from the
new price in A, by only a small quantity, in which case also the
cost of transport, e, must be small, since otherwise exportation
from A to B would not take place on the removal of the barrier.
This reasoning, or that which is based on another particular
assumption, viz. δ and pb — (pa + e) small (Art. 68, Iastpar.), is
quite correct. But the assumption that e should be small leads to
an erroneous conclusion in a subsequent problem : to determine
the effect of a tax on exports or imports (Art. 70).
If p is the price of the article in the exporting country before
the imposition of the tax u, and p + δ the price after the tax, we
have, before the tax, ∩a(p) + ∩b(p + e) = Fa(p) + Fb(p + e).2
And after the tax u per unit of commodity has been imposed, we
have
Ω∙a(p + ɛ) + ʃɪb(p + δ + e + u)
= -^,a(P + δ) + Fb(p + δ + e + u).
Cournot now proceeds to draw conclusions from the last
equation by expanding and neglecting the powers, not only of δ
and u, but also e, above the first power. I submit that Cournot’s
ɪ For pa + δ being the price of the commodity in A, and accordingly the (net)
price which the producers in A obtain (not only for that portion of the product
which they sell in A, but also) for that portion of their product which they sell in
B at a price heightened by the cost of transport e, the quantity offered by the pro-
ducers resident in A at the (net) price pa + δ, together with the quantity offered by
the residents in B at the price pa + δ + e, is equal to the quantity demanded by
the residents in A at the price pa + δ, together with the quantity demanded by the
residents in B at the price pa + δ + e.
2 Compare the last note.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
3. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
4. The name is absent
5. The Values and Character Dispositions of 14-16 Year Olds in the Hodge Hill Constituency
6. The name is absent
7. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
8. The name is absent
9. STIMULATING COOPERATION AMONG FARMERS IN A POST-SOCIALIST ECONOMY: LESSONS FROM A PUBLIC-PRIVATE MARKETING PARTNERSHIP IN POLAND
10. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015