The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke



same to the Commissary-General, as an instruction to him that the extraordinary allowances
to Sir Eyre Coote
should be discontinued, and no part thereof paid after that day. That it
appears, nevertheless, that the said extra allowances (amounting to above twenty thousand
pounds sterling a year) were continued to be charged to the Vizier, and paid to Sir Eyre
Coote, in defiance of the orders of the Court of Directors, in defiance of the consequent
resolution of the Governor-General and Council, and in contradiction to the terms of the
original motion made by the said Warren Hastings for adding those allowances to the debit
of the Vizier, viz., "that they should continue till Sir Eyre Coote's return to the
Caramnassa." That Sir Eyre Coote arrived at Calcutta about the end of August, 1780, and
must have crossed the Caramnassa, in his return from Oude, some weeks before, when the
charge on the Vizier, if at any time proper, ought to have ceased. That it appears that the
said allowances were continued to be charged against the Vizier and paid to Sir Eyre Coote
for three years after, even while he was serving in the Carnatic, and that this was done by
the sole authority and private command of the said Warren Hastings.

That the East India Company having thought proper to create the office of Advocate-
General in Bengal, and to appoint Sir John Day to that office, it was resolved by a General
Court of Proprietors that a salary of three thousand pounds a year should be allowed to the
said Sir John Day,
in full consideration of all demands and allowances whatsoever for his
services to the Company at the Presidency of Fort William
. That the said Warren Hastings,
nevertheless, shortly after Sir John Day's arrival in Bengal, did increase the said Sir John
Day's salary and allowances to six thousand pounds a year, in direct disobedience of the
resolution of the Court of Proprietors, and of the order of the Court of Directors. That the
Directors, as soon as they were informed of this proceeding, declared, "that they held
themselves bound by the resolution of the General Court, and that they could not allow it to



More intriguing information

1. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
2. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
3. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
4. Life is an Adventure! An agent-based reconciliation of narrative and scientific worldviews
5. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
6. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
7. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
8. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
19. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION
20. The name is absent