William Davidson Institute Working Paper 479
Table 2:
Impact of Changes in the Toughness of
the Minimum Wage on Inequaltiy
|
Range of Toughness Measure | |||
|
Lowest |
Median |
Highest | |
|
Increase in |
(30.0) |
(55.5) |
(89.0) |
|
Gini |
-0.0195 |
-0.0093 |
0.0041 |
|
Theil |
-0.0346 |
-0.0173 |
0.00552 |
Table 3:
Impact of Minimum wages on the Log of Employment
|
Total |
Covered Sector Employment |
Self- | |
|
Toughness |
0.019 c |
0.0211 c |
0.016 |
|
(0.011) |
(0.0118) |
(0.19) | |
|
(Toughness)2 |
-0.00014 c |
-0.00014 c |
-0.00018 |
|
(0.00007) |
(0.00009) |
(0.00014) | |
|
Time Dummies |
yes |
yes |
yes |
|
Industry Dummies |
yes |
yes |
yes |
|
Adjusted R2 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
|
No. of Observations |
91 |
91 |
91 |
aSignificant at the 1% level; bsignificant at the 5% level; csignificant at
the 10% level.
14
More intriguing information
1. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL2. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
3. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Shepherd Sinfonia
7. The name is absent
8. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
9. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
10. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION