Road pricing and (re)location decisions households



provided by Research Papers in Economics

Road pricing and (re)location decisions households

ERSA 2005 Congress
Amsterdam

Taede Tillema
Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU)

Utrecht University
t.tillema@ geog.uu.nl

Dick Ettema

Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU)

Utrecht University
d.ettema@ geog.uu.nl

Bert van Wee

Section of Transport Policy and Logistics Organisation
Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management
Delft University of Technology,
[email protected]

Abstract

This paper focuses on possible influences of road pricing policies on residential and work location choices of
households. Road pricing may play a role in both stages of the relocation process: the decision whether or not to
relocate and the choice of the new residential location. On average roughly 5 percent of the respondents
indicated a remarkably high probability of moving to another residential location if a road pricing measure
would be implemented. The probability of searching for another job on the other hand was found to be
significantly higher for all price measures: on average 13.5 percent. The majority of these respondents also
answered that the chance of changing house or work within 2 years (for whatever reason) is considerable.
Therefore, the actual relocation specifically due to road pricing may be considerably lower than the observed
percentages. Important explanatory variables for changing the residential or work location due to the
introduction of a kilometre charge are: the level of travel cost compensation, the size of the municipality, the
type of region (i.e. living in a region suffering from congestion problems or not), and the number of working
hours per week. Specifically in the case of work change, the commuting distance is an important explanatory
factor too. Finally, beside the more personal, work and trip related characteristics, several perceptions and short
term behavioural changes also seem to have a relation with the relocation probability. Furthermore, looking at
the influence of different variables in the actual residential location choice, travel cost (including road pricing)
seems to be an important factor. First of all respondents are more sensitive to travel costs than to housing costs.
In the second place respondents value travel time less negatively than travel costs. Next to travel cost, location
related factors such the type of location and the number of bedrooms seem to be important factors in a residential
location choice too.



More intriguing information

1. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
2. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
3. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
4. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
5. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
6. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
7. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
8. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
9. The name is absent
10. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
11. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
12. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
13. The name is absent
14. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
15. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION
16. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
17. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
18. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
19. The name is absent
20. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA