4.2 Explanatory characteristics for relocation choice
4.2.1 Residential relocation
Table 6 gives the results of an ordered probit analysis aimed at getting insight into
explanatory variables for the probability of moving to a residential location closer to work due
to the introduction of a kilometre charge. For the analyses the relocation probabilities
observed for the first three pricing measures (see table 1) were combined. Explanatory
variables for the cordon charge are not presented in this paper (i.e. measures 4 and 5).
Furthermore, to be able to study the explanatory characteristics of changing locations
specifically initiated by a road pricing measure, respondents that indicated to have a
moderately high, high or extremely high possibility of changing their residential location
within 2 years (for whatever reason) were removed from the dataset. In total a range of about
30 variables were tested on significance. The variables consisted of various socio-economic
characteristics (e.g. income, household size, age, education level) and furthermore of other
household related and various trip and price measure related characteristics. Finally also
attitudes and perception characteristics were tested. Only variables significant with a
reliability of at least 90 percent are presented in the table.
Table 6: results analysis of probability of moving house closer to work (ordered probit) due to a km charge
|
Coefficient |
T-value |
P-value | |
|
Constant |
0.0114 |
0.056 |
0.9555 |
|
Personal, work and trip related characteristics | |||
|
dummy yearly gross household income high (>68000 euro =1) |
0.4052 |
2.799 |
0.0051 |
|
dummy living alone (yes=1) |
-0.2472 |
-1.794 |
0.0728 |
|
dummy owned house (yes=1) |
-0.4060 |
-3.343 |
0.0008 |
|
dummy living in a region with congestion problems (yes=1) |
-0.2582 |
-2.379 |
0.0173 |
|
dummy size municipality (≥50.000 inhab.=1) |
-0.2440 |
-2.352 |
0.0187 |
|
dummy travel cost compensation employer (completely compens.=1) |
-0.4784 |
-3.748 |
0.0002 |
|
dummy working hours/week (≥35 hours∕week=1) |
0.4537 |
3.479 |
0.0005 |
|
dummy car medium weight (yes=1) |
0.2610 |
2.540 |
0.0111 |
|
dummy gasoline car (yes=1) |
-0.3491 |
-2.875 |
0.0040 |
|
Perceptions and behavioural changes | |||
|
dummy perception of being better of due to measure (better of =1) |
-0.4859 |
-2.454 |
0.0141 |
|
dummy adjusting short term trip behaviour due to rp measure (yes=1) |
0.2914 |
2.178 |
0.0294 |
|
dummy prob. changing job due to rp measure (quite to high prob=1) |
0.3384 |
2.283 |
0.0224 |
|
И1 |
1.173 | ||
|
Ц2 |
1.769 |
Log likelihood (constants)
Log likelihood (convergence)
X2
-540.6
-488.5
104.2
12
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation
5. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
6. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
7. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
8. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
9. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
10. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA