IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY



provided by Research Papers in Economics

IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS
ON FARM PROFITABILITY

Ronald D. Knutson, Joe L. Outlaw and John W. Miller
Texas A&M University

With the initiation of dairy waste regulatory activity in Texas and
Florida during the early 1990s, questions have arisen regarding the
impacts of these regulations if extended throughout the United
States. The Agricultural and Food Policy Center (AFPC) system of
representative dairy farms provided a unique opportunity to evalu-
ate the impacts of these regulations on dairy farm profitability if ex-
tended to all other states.

EPA Dairy Waste Policy

With the exception of concentrated animal feeding operations
(CAFOs), agriculture has been treated as a nonpoint source of pollu-
tion. Nonpoint pollution means there is no legally recognized identi-
fiable source of that pollution. Point pollution, on the other hand,
can best be illustrated by an industrial plant or a sewer system that
drains directly into a river or stream, leaving no question regarding
the source of that pollution. The requirement has been that such
point sources of pollution internalize the cost of cleaning up the dis-
charge except under extremely unusual and basically uncontrollable
circumstances. Such point sources of pollution must receive a permit
explaining measures taken to prevent illegal discharges.

Concentrated animal feeding operations have been identified as a
point pollution source because, in the eyes of the regulatory au-
thorities, they are much like a factory. The issue becomes one of de-
fining a CAFO. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cur-
rently requires a discharge permit for any dairy having more than
700 cows. The permit will be issued if the dairy farmer demonstrates
he or she has taken steps to contain pollutants and prevent dis-
charges up to a twenty-five-year∕twenty-four-hour storm event. If
there is already an identifiable direct discharge, the threshold for re-
ceiving a permit may extend to 200 cows or even less, if a complaint
is received by the EPA. The requirements for receiving a permit are
more stringent for new operations than they are for existing opera-
tions.

In most states, EPA regulations are enforced by state environmen-
tal regulatory agencies under what is called delegated authority
(Table 1). The requirement for a state to receive delegated authority

199



More intriguing information

1. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
2. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
3. The name is absent
4. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
5. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
6. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
7. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
8. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
9. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
10. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
11. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
12. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
13. The name is absent
14. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
15. The name is absent
16. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
17. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS
18. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
19. References
20. Searching Threshold Inflation for India