IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY



provided by Research Papers in Economics

IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS
ON FARM PROFITABILITY

Ronald D. Knutson, Joe L. Outlaw and John W. Miller
Texas A&M University

With the initiation of dairy waste regulatory activity in Texas and
Florida during the early 1990s, questions have arisen regarding the
impacts of these regulations if extended throughout the United
States. The Agricultural and Food Policy Center (AFPC) system of
representative dairy farms provided a unique opportunity to evalu-
ate the impacts of these regulations on dairy farm profitability if ex-
tended to all other states.

EPA Dairy Waste Policy

With the exception of concentrated animal feeding operations
(CAFOs), agriculture has been treated as a nonpoint source of pollu-
tion. Nonpoint pollution means there is no legally recognized identi-
fiable source of that pollution. Point pollution, on the other hand,
can best be illustrated by an industrial plant or a sewer system that
drains directly into a river or stream, leaving no question regarding
the source of that pollution. The requirement has been that such
point sources of pollution internalize the cost of cleaning up the dis-
charge except under extremely unusual and basically uncontrollable
circumstances. Such point sources of pollution must receive a permit
explaining measures taken to prevent illegal discharges.

Concentrated animal feeding operations have been identified as a
point pollution source because, in the eyes of the regulatory au-
thorities, they are much like a factory. The issue becomes one of de-
fining a CAFO. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cur-
rently requires a discharge permit for any dairy having more than
700 cows. The permit will be issued if the dairy farmer demonstrates
he or she has taken steps to contain pollutants and prevent dis-
charges up to a twenty-five-year∕twenty-four-hour storm event. If
there is already an identifiable direct discharge, the threshold for re-
ceiving a permit may extend to 200 cows or even less, if a complaint
is received by the EPA. The requirements for receiving a permit are
more stringent for new operations than they are for existing opera-
tions.

In most states, EPA regulations are enforced by state environmen-
tal regulatory agencies under what is called delegated authority
(Table 1). The requirement for a state to receive delegated authority

199



More intriguing information

1. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
2. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
3. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
4. GOVERNANÇA E MECANISMOS DE CONTROLE SOCIAL EM REDES ORGANIZACIONAIS
5. The name is absent
6. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
7. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
11. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE
12. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
13. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
14. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
15. The name is absent
16. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
17. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
18. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China
19. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
20. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered