The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South



Table 3. Panel Estimates for Models

and 2.

Method

VarName

DF

Estimate

StdErr

t Value

Probt

Model 1

Intercept

1

2.092582

0.8904

2.35

0.0188

MKS

1

0.016469

0.00682

2.42*

0.0157

CTR

1

-0.01163

0.00981

-1.19

0.2359

CAE

1

0.205024

0.0151

13.6*

<.0001

CAR

1

0.768611

0.4115

1.87

0.0619

DER_____

1

-0.00089

0.00388

-0.23

0.8188

Model 2

Intercept

1

2.436144

0.9463

2.57

0.0101

MKS

1

0.017034

0.00685

2.49*

0.013

CTR

1

-0.01261

0.00981

-1.29

0.1988

CAE

1

0.204317

0.0151

13.54*

<.0001

CAR

1

0.739718

0.4118

1.8

0.0726

DER_____

1

-0.00092

0.00388

-0.24

0.8121

Sdum 1

1

-0.95568

0.2978

-3.21*

0.0013

Sdum3

1

-0.30519

0.3374

-0.9

0.3658

Cdum1

1

-0.33877

0.8375

-0.4

0.6859

Rdum3

1

0.41074

0.9197

0.45

0.6552

*Significant at the 5% level.

13



More intriguing information

1. EMU: some unanswered questions
2. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION
3. A model-free approach to delta hedging
4. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
5. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
6. The name is absent
7. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices
8. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
9. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
10. The name is absent