The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South



Table 3. Panel Estimates for Models

and 2.

Method

VarName

DF

Estimate

StdErr

t Value

Probt

Model 1

Intercept

1

2.092582

0.8904

2.35

0.0188

MKS

1

0.016469

0.00682

2.42*

0.0157

CTR

1

-0.01163

0.00981

-1.19

0.2359

CAE

1

0.205024

0.0151

13.6*

<.0001

CAR

1

0.768611

0.4115

1.87

0.0619

DER_____

1

-0.00089

0.00388

-0.23

0.8188

Model 2

Intercept

1

2.436144

0.9463

2.57

0.0101

MKS

1

0.017034

0.00685

2.49*

0.013

CTR

1

-0.01261

0.00981

-1.29

0.1988

CAE

1

0.204317

0.0151

13.54*

<.0001

CAR

1

0.739718

0.4118

1.8

0.0726

DER_____

1

-0.00092

0.00388

-0.24

0.8121

Sdum 1

1

-0.95568

0.2978

-3.21*

0.0013

Sdum3

1

-0.30519

0.3374

-0.9

0.3658

Cdum1

1

-0.33877

0.8375

-0.4

0.6859

Rdum3

1

0.41074

0.9197

0.45

0.6552

*Significant at the 5% level.

13



More intriguing information

1. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
2. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
3. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
4. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
5. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
6. The name is absent
7. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent