The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South



In the above equation, PFTi is net income (in million) of firms i and is a measure of
performance. The variable
CTRi is a four-firm revenue concentration ratio by region and is a
measure of market structure. The variable
MKSi is the percentage revenue market share of firm i
and is a measure of firm efficiency. The variable CAEi represents cash and equivalents and is a
measure of how much cash and working capital are available to the carrier for short-term
obligations. The variable
CARi is capital to asset ratio and DERi is debt to equity ratio. Both
these variables reflect risk taking by the firm. The variable
DRi is a regional dummy variable
that equals 1 if the firm is located in the south, and 0 otherwise. The variable
DR1 is commodity
dummy that equals 1 if the firm hauled agricultural commodities, and 0 otherwise. The variable
DR2 is commodity dummy that equals 1 if the firm hauled refrigerated food products, and 0
otherwise. The variable
Ui is the error term with a mean of zero and a variance of one.

In the study by Kari et al, 2002, the authors used annual and pooled data for truck carriers
that hauled agricultural commodities during the period 1997-1999. In our analyses, we not only
used the same carrier group but also used a longer time period (1994-2002) to test the two
hypotheses. In testing the two hypotheses for the agricultural commodity carrier group, we also
compared the annual and pooled data results for the periods 1994-1996 and 2000-2002 with the
results obtained by Kari et al (1997-1999) to determine which hypothesis is true. Results of that
study indicated that efficiency is the driving force behind performance of firms in the agricultural
commodity carrier industry. The analysis was expanded to include U. S. trucking industry as a
group and other industry segments particularly the refrigerated food products to test whether the
market structure, market share, and profits were the results of the efficiency or the traditional
structure hypothesis during the 9-year period (1994-2002).



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
4. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
5. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
6. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
7. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
8. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
9. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach
10. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
11. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
12. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
17. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET