APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE



Table 8. J. R. Smith farm, Louisa County: Partial Budgeting Results

Units

Units Credited

Unit Price

Total

$

$

Added Costs

None

Added Returns

None

Reduced Costs

127 lbs. N/acre

lbs

60

0.23

13.80

367 lbs. P/acre

lbs

30

0.30

9.00

253 lbs. K/acre

lbs

90

0.14

12.60

Fertilizer application cost savings

acre

1

5.50

5.50

Sub-Total

40.90

Reduced Returns

None

Total savings (loss)

40.90

Even though the drought in 1997 affected wide areas of the state, Smith’s farm received three rains
during the summer that were sufficient for good forage growth. Smith reported that the biosolids-treated
pasture stayed green all summer while pastures treated with commercial fertilizer did not do as well.
Smith estimated that the biosolids-treated pasture received 50 percent more grazing pressure than the
untreated pastures. He observed that the treated pasture not only stayed greener during the summer, but
also grew back more quickly after grazing, grew well until the fall frosts, and looked better than untreated
pastures in December.

Evanylo and Ross conducted a rainfall simulation project during summer 1997 on Smith’s pasture where
biosolids had been applied. Control areas without biosolids were compared to areas receiving biosolids.
The plots with biosolids produced 2,280 pounds of dry matter clipped six weeks after application compared
to only 1,380 pounds of forage produced on the control plots during the same time. Greater water
infiltration also occurred on the plots receiving biosolids compared to the pasture control area. Simulated
rainfall of 3.86 inches was absorbed by the area with biosolids compared to 3.64 inches on the control
area: an increase of 0.22 inches water stored.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Water quality problems generally result when the non-point source pollution contributions from multiple
land users combine to reach a critical mass, producing observable negative effects. The damages from
an individual environmental contamination event on a single site are probably limited in extent and
significance. Thus, overall land use and water quality usually must be monitored and understood at the
watershed level to define non-point source pollution problems, to identify causes, to effect linkages
between land use and environmental pollution, and to implement strategies to solve such problems.

Incorrect application of nutrients coupled with wet weather and steep slopes can result in non-point
source pollution to surface and ground waters. As is generally the case with non-point source pollutants
(soil delivered to waterways, agricultural chemicals, commercial fertilizers, and livestock manures), the
greatest potential for environmental degradation from biosolids applications would result from severe rain



More intriguing information

1. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
2. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
6. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
7. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
8. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
9. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
10. The name is absent
11. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know
12. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
13. SOME ISSUES CONCERNING SPECIFICATION AND INTERPRETATION OF OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND MODELS
14. A Brief Introduction to the Guidance Theory of Representation
15. The name is absent
16. Iconic memory or icon?
17. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry
18. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
19. The name is absent
20. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation