The farm 9, that has good soils, does not produce durum wheat and it starts to produce
barley. With respect to the beef cattle farms, these farms maintain the number of cattle
heads, they increase the pasture and forage areas and they substitute durum wheat for
barley. The sheep farms reduce their herds drastically and they substitute durum wheat
for barley and oats. As the decoupling of income payments is not related to farm
production, the variability of the results decreases. The level of subsidies decreases due to
the new values of the specific subsidy to the durum wheat and the modulation.
Table 4.2 - Model Results with the new CAP- Partial Decoupling of Income Payments
|
Description |
Farn |
Farm |
Farm |
Farm |
Farm |
Farm |
Farm |
Farm |
Farm |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5____ |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 | |
|
Crop Activities | |||||||||
|
Barley |
43.9 |
14.1 |
27.9 |
53.8 |
36.1 |
67.5 | |||
|
Oats |
136.8 |
27.9 | |||||||
|
Sunflower |
105.3 |
2.6 |
67.5 | ||||||
|
Oats/Vicia |
64.6 |
64.5 |
31.3 |
62.1 |
39.6 |
142.3 | |||
|
Pastures |
824.2 |
442.0 |
133.0 |
286.2 |
193.0 |
786.0 | |||
|
Setaside_________ |
69.1 |
107.0 |
______1.6 |
193.8 |
313.6 |
200.0 |
260.0 |
27.7 |
415.0 |
|
Total area_______ |
1200.0 |
690.0 |
180.0 |
570.0 |
600.0 |
200.0 |
260.0 |
1020.0 |
550.0 |
|
Livestock Activities | |||||||||
|
Beef cattle |
400 |
150 |
90 |
450 | |||||
|
Sheep_________ |
1006 |
564 | |||||||
|
Farm Income | |||||||||
|
State of Nature 1 |
21 944 |
34 916 |
5 576 |
17 164 |
7 472 |
9 926 |
17 319 |
24 857 |
2 534 |
|
State of Nature 2 |
56 484 |
40 806 |
13 347 |
21 805 |
10 819 |
9 926 |
17 319 |
58 986 |
9 224 |
|
State of Nature 3 |
78 991 |
48 962 |
16 437 |
27 481 |
17 172 |
9 926 |
17 319 |
74 399 |
17 986 |
|
State of Nature 4 |
94 223 |
54 808 |
18 820 |
30 725 |
22 088 |
9 926 |
17 319 |
85 680 |
26 199 |
|
State of Nature 5 |
103 949 |
56 754 |
19 903 |
32 139 |
23 186 |
9 926 |
17 319 |
90 030 |
32 337 |
|
Subsidies | |||||||||
|
Dec. payment |
160 523 |
76 638 |
26 826 |
62 519 |
87 338 |
33 894 |
45 983 |
114 389 |
101 466 |
|
Prod. Subsidies |
74 582 |
35 300 |
16 781 |
11 976 |
6 713 |
______0 |
______0 |
83 904 |
______0 |
Notes: Crop activities in hectares, livestock activities in animal units and monetary values in Euros.
Source: Model Results.
Among various alternatives under the mid-term review of the Common Agricultural
Policy, the Portuguese government decided to assign to farm production 50% of sheep
premium, 100% of veal premium, 100% of suckler cow premium and 40% of slaughter
19
More intriguing information
1. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies2. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
3. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
4. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
5. New urban settlements in Belarus: some trends and changes
6. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
7. Portuguese Women in Science and Technology (S&T): Some Gender Features Behind MSc. and PhD. Achievement
8. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
9. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
10. The name is absent