Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade



Theoretical Justification for Using the Gravity Model

Classical gravity models generally use cross-sectional data to estimate trade effects and
trade relationships for a particular time period. However, cross-sectional data observed over
several time periods (panel data methodology) result in more useful information than cross-
sectional data observed in say a year. The advantages of this method are that panels can capture
the relevant rela0tionships among variables over time, and panels can monitor unobservable
trading -partner pairs’ individual effects (Rahman, 2003).

Deriving its origins from Newton’s law of gravity in mechanics, gravity models
analogously determine trade flows between two or more countries as a function of their
respective economic masses, the distance between the economies and a variety of other factors.
Therefore, the Newtonian physics notion provides the first justification for using the gravity
model. A second justification derives application from the partial equilibrium model of export
supply and import demand presented by Lineman (1966). Based on some simplifying
assumptions discussed in the model derivation section, the gravity model is derived as a reduced
form equation with characteristics similar to the original Newtonian model.

The gravity model has been applied to evaluate bilateral trade flows of aggregate
commodities between pairs of countries and across regions (Oguledo and Macphee, 1994).
Gravity modeling was originally developed by Tinbergen (1962), but with little in the way of
theoretical justification. Recently, it has found empirical application in determining trade flows
and policy analysis (Koo and Karemera, 1991), boarder effects inhibiting trade (McCallum,
1995; Helliwell, 1996 and 1998), and impacts of currency arrangements on bilateral trade (Rose,
2000; Frankel and Rose, 2002; Glick and Rose, 2002).

Koo and Karemera (1991) state that research in this area (such as Takayama and Judge,
4



More intriguing information

1. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
2. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
3. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
4. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-2004
5. The name is absent
6. Nonparametric cointegration analysis
7. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
8. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
9. The name is absent
10. The constitution and evolution of the stars
11. The name is absent
12. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
13. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
14. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
15. EU enlargement and environmental policy
16. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
17. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
18. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent