The name is absent



preferences follow. Habits may arise because it is costly for the household to adjust consumption in
response to changes in the economic environment. These costs may involve the cost of learning and
perfecting new recipes and any psychological disutilities from switching to new cuisine. Conversely,
inventory adjustment may be a result of hoarding on the part of the household to take advantage of
supermarket specials or an appetite for food diversities. Finally, additive separability for any two
goods (
i, j) is implied if bij = 0. It is important to test habit formation in meat consumption in a
demand system framework as all empirical studies of meat demand decisively reject separabilities
across meat types.

To incorporate the effects of food safety information on the household preferences, the parameter
ai is further specified to be a linear function of the household’s perception of meat safety. That is,

ai = ai0 + ai1 bst + ai2pst + ai3cst

(7)


where bst , pst and cst are, respectively, consumer perceptions of the safety of beef, pork and
poultry. Because there is no way to determine a priori the most appropriate way of representing
these perception variables with our news indices. We examine the performance of a few alternative
representations in more detail in the model results section.

4.2 Estimation strategy

When estimating a dynamic rational expectations model, the Generalized Method of Moments
(GMM) of Hansen (1982) is the natural choice. Use the direct utility function (6) to parameterize
the marginal utility of consumption (3)

ait           lnxjt      lnxit-1           lnxit+1

(8)


MUit =--+ > bij—+ + bi--+ βEt bi---—

mit          mit mit             mit

j=1

for i = 1, 2 and 3. Next, use (8) and (5) to derive an estimable form of the FOC

eit =


a1t            lnxjt      lnx1t-1        lnx1t+1

---+ > , bij—+ + bi------+ bιβ------

m1t          m1t m1t          m1t

j=i

ait
mit


3

+    bij

j=i


lnx jt
mit


lnxit-i

+ bi-------

mit


+ biβ


lnxit+1
mit


(9)


for i equal to 2 (pork) and 3 (poultry), where mi is the expenditure on the ith meat. The expecta-
tions in (5) are replaced by realizations less innovations. These innovations are expectation errors

11



More intriguing information

1. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
2. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
3. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
4. Developmental Robots - A New Paradigm
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
10. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
11. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
12. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
13. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
14. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
15. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
16. The name is absent
17. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
18. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
19. The name is absent
20. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity