The name is absent



loyalty beneath which it is impossible for the manufacturer to have sale response to
non- price strategies expenditurers. The existence of delisting means that higher
advertising and R&D expenditures increases the probability of surpassing the
threshold and allow the firm (brand) to operate in the no- delisting region. A specific
store loyalty threshold. works as an all- or nothing divide. Being above the critical
threshold of store loyalty is crucial if a brand manufacturer intends to continue to
operate as such. This minimum level of brand loyalty implies that advertising and R&D
could be useless and unprofitable below the ‘threshold level’ identified by the level of
store loyalty which therefore determines the minimum level of advertising and R&D
investment to build a brand that could be listed.

In other words, from the point of view of a manufacturer, it is not enough to have a
brand somewhere along the X-axis. It is also necessary to make sure that the brand
surpasses the critical threshold of store loyalty to be positioned in the no- delisting
region. Hence, the incentive to build a stronger brand enjoys double benefits in terms
of higher retail margins and lower risk of delisting.

Focusing again on advertising for simplicity as in the (1) above, the existence of a
threshold level due to delisting implies that, at a sufficiently high level of store loyalty,
there is a larger region of advertising increasing returns, hence a greater advertising
effectiveness and optimal advertising intensity than in the Steiner’ s model. Therefore,
we obtain:

(A*/S)dd > (A*/S)d >(A*/S)s                                           (2)

where (A*/S)dd is the advertising intensity in a dual- stage framework with delisting.

In other words, the effectiveness of advertising and R&D is even higher in a two- stage
framework with delisting since non- price strategies of innovation and differentiation
not only allow to obtain the Steiner effect of a lower retailer’ s margin but they also
allow the manufacturer brand access to retailer’ s shelf space. The ideas of Figures 1
and 2 can thus be summarized in the following proposition:

Proposition 1: Vertical competition with delisting decisions creates a further
mechanism in addition to the margin- depressing effect (the ‘Steiner effect’), leading to
even greater upstream incentives to adopt non- price strategies of innovation and
differentiation.

But Figure 2 makes an additional point. One key consequence of this mechanism is
that retailers looking for room to allocate their private labels will be more likely to
replace lower- tier brands with private labels. In other words, leading brands will
continue to be stocked by retailers as a consequence of their nature of must- have
brands, but retailers will be more likely to replace lower- tier brands.

Retailers are then motivated to substitute secondary brands the brands with lowest
margin in the delisting region. Less well- known manufacturer's brand, or tertiary
brands, are relatively in a safer position given that the retailer’ s margin on these
brands is higher than that of secondary brands.

Thus, we have the following proposition:

16



More intriguing information

1. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
2. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
3. EMU: some unanswered questions
4. The name is absent
5. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
6. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
7. 03-01 "Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts - The Distributional Impacts of Repealing Dividend Taxation"
8. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
9. The name is absent
10. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
11. The name is absent
12. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION
13. The name is absent
14. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
15. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
16. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
17. The name is absent
18. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent