1 — α(2a — 1) |
— ΛiJi |
EtbtR+i = BRbtR , α (2a — 1) — α Ji |
R |
xR πR(h-f*) KKtR] 0 | ||
BR ≡ |
— (2a — 1) — |
ΛiJ2 |
α(2a — 1) |
J2 |
0 | |
Λι |
0 |
1 |
0 | |||
— ∣σ(2a — 1) KC + |
4θa(1-a) Z "I |
J3 |
0 |
1 +__1____ 1 + (2a-1) |
[ KC+ δ2(1 — a)] |
where J1 = (μ-1) [1 + а(1-Лл2(2а-1)] and J2 = О-1)<1-Л2)(2а-1) under domestic inflation
tarp'etinp'∙ wħereαs J1 = (μ-1)(2a-1)[a(1-л2)+ (2a-1)] and j = (μ-1)(1-λ2 )(2a-1) under cpι
targeting; whereas J1 = βΛ2[i-2(i-a)μ] and J2 = βΛ2[i-2(l-a)μ] undercPI
inflation targeting. Finally J3 = Ca α) KZ [1 + α4θa(1 — a)] + σα(2a — 1)KC. Analogous
to the aggregate system, one eigenvalue of the system is zero. Therefore determinacy
requires the eigenvalue 1 + (2a-1) [C + δ2(1 — a)] to have a modulus greater than one,
and the two remaining eigenvalues of BR are also outside the unit circle. By Proposition
C.1 of Woodford (2003) the following results are obtained:
Proposition 5 Suppose that monetary policy reacts to forward-looking domestic price
inflation. Then for an active monetary policy (μ > 1), the necessary and sufficient con-
ditions for determinacy of the difference system are
(Case I) a > 0.5 and
1 <U< 1 + min∫rB ≡ (1 — в)Л2 ГА ≡ 2(1+ в)Л2 V
(40)
(41)
<μ< + t1 ≡ αΛι(2a — 1)2 ≡ Λια(2 — Λ2)(2a — 1) ∫ ;
(Case II)
0.5 > a > - - 1 — δ — =-
2 — δ K 2
where Λ1 = (1 ψ)(1 βψ) and Λ2 = 1 — β(1 — δ).
Proposition 6 Suppose that monetary policy reacts to forward-looking consumer price
inflation. Then for an active monetary policy (μ > 1), the necessary and sufficient con-
22
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
3. The name is absent
4. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
5. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
6. The name is absent
7. Markets for Influence
8. Trade and Empire, 1700-1870
9. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
10. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin