1 — α(2a — 1) |
— ΛiJi |
EtbtR+i = BRbtR , α (2a — 1) — α Ji |
R |
xR πR(h-f*) KKtR] 0 | ||
BR ≡ |
— (2a — 1) — |
ΛiJ2 |
α(2a — 1) |
J2 |
0 | |
Λι |
0 |
1 |
0 | |||
— ∣σ(2a — 1) KC + |
4θa(1-a) Z "I |
J3 |
0 |
1 +__1____ 1 + (2a-1) |
[ KC+ δ2(1 — a)] |
where J1 = (μ-1) [1 + а(1-Лл2(2а-1)] and J2 = О-1)<1-Л2)(2а-1) under domestic inflation
tarp'etinp'∙ wħereαs J1 = (μ-1)(2a-1)[a(1-л2)+ (2a-1)] and j = (μ-1)(1-λ2 )(2a-1) under cpι
targeting; whereas J1 = βΛ2[i-2(i-a)μ] and J2 = βΛ2[i-2(l-a)μ] undercPI
inflation targeting. Finally J3 = Ca α) KZ [1 + α4θa(1 — a)] + σα(2a — 1)KC. Analogous
to the aggregate system, one eigenvalue of the system is zero. Therefore determinacy
requires the eigenvalue 1 + (2a-1) [C + δ2(1 — a)] to have a modulus greater than one,
and the two remaining eigenvalues of BR are also outside the unit circle. By Proposition
C.1 of Woodford (2003) the following results are obtained:
Proposition 5 Suppose that monetary policy reacts to forward-looking domestic price
inflation. Then for an active monetary policy (μ > 1), the necessary and sufficient con-
ditions for determinacy of the difference system are
(Case I) a > 0.5 and
1 <U< 1 + min∫rB ≡ (1 — в)Л2 ГА ≡ 2(1+ в)Л2 V
(40)
(41)
<μ< + t1 ≡ αΛι(2a — 1)2 ≡ Λια(2 — Λ2)(2a — 1) ∫ ;
(Case II)
0.5 > a > - - 1 — δ — =-
2 — δ K 2
where Λ1 = (1 ψ)(1 βψ) and Λ2 = 1 — β(1 — δ).
Proposition 6 Suppose that monetary policy reacts to forward-looking consumer price
inflation. Then for an active monetary policy (μ > 1), the necessary and sufficient con-
22