Table 2: Estimation with Inferred Static Gap: Macroeconomic Data
|
Data |
Driving force ρ (annual) |
Increase in R2 |
|
BLS, as in CE (1993) |
0.13 | |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj. |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj., |
0.75a |
0.01 |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj. as in CW (2001) |
0.47 |
0.03 |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj., as in CW (2004) |
____________0.28____________ |
0.05 |
‘Increase in R2’ denotes the difference between the R2 obtained when estimating a model with a non-
constant hazard and the R2 when imposing a constant hazard, in both cases using the methodology in CE
(1993). ‘Sim. Quadr. Adj.’ stands for ‘Simulated Quadratic Adjustment’.
aThis value of ρ is somewhat below both the value in the driving force used in CE and the values used when
calibrating RBC models (see Cooley and Prescott, 1995).
12
More intriguing information
1. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES2. The Shepherd Sinfonia
3. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
4. Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU
5. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
6. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
7. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
8. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
9. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
10. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1