Table 2: Estimation with Inferred Static Gap: Macroeconomic Data
|
Data |
Driving force ρ (annual) |
Increase in R2 |
|
BLS, as in CE (1993) |
0.13 | |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj. |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj., |
0.75a |
0.01 |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj. as in CW (2001) |
0.47 |
0.03 |
|
Sim. Quadr. Adj., as in CW (2004) |
____________0.28____________ |
0.05 |
‘Increase in R2’ denotes the difference between the R2 obtained when estimating a model with a non-
constant hazard and the R2 when imposing a constant hazard, in both cases using the methodology in CE
(1993). ‘Sim. Quadr. Adj.’ stands for ‘Simulated Quadratic Adjustment’.
aThis value of ρ is somewhat below both the value in the driving force used in CE and the values used when
calibrating RBC models (see Cooley and Prescott, 1995).
12
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. On the job rotation problem
3. Iconic memory or icon?
4. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements
5. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
6. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
7. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
8. The name is absent
9. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
10. The name is absent