Korea
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
1.00
Hong Kong
1.00
Malaysia
Singapore
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
1.00
Indon.
1.00
Thail.
-1.00
1.00
Philip.
Fig. 3c - Stock market correlation of weekly returns
(Asia vs. USA and Japan; 3 month exponential moving average)
USA
AA√∣∣⅛ r..f∖ ∕⅜⅛ |
[Чд W | ||
1 У Wpyj у |
NA/ | ||
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll |
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii |
Iiiiiiiiiiii |
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
_______ |
ITTmTTTlTTTTTTTTlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIIIIII
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
ɪ A/M | |||
_ rɪ j—Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii инн |
м' inn ni ni ni и I τππ |
Vw г Tttiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiim |
v" f ιιιιιιιιιι Iiiiiiiiiii— |
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
7γM⅛ |
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
ITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTIIIIlllllIllll III III Illlll III III Il III IlllIl III III IlIlllIl III III III III III IlIlll III Il III Illlll III III III
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
∕4∖ |
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
- лД/Уч fι | |||
- r⅛r ⅛ v j Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii inn |
√ W inn Iiiiiiiiiiii iiiii |
Otiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ιιιιιιπ |
T Iiiiiiiii Iiiiiiiiii |
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00
Japan
≡ /ДА |
∕imj, | |
j Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii |
∏∏⅛n Iiiiiiiiiii Iiiiiiiiiiii |
ιιιιιιιι Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii IiiiiiTriiiiiiiiii Iiiiiiiiiii |
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
-0.75
-1.00

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrιιιιιι и ni linn ni ni Iiiiiiiiiii linn Iirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrni ni и ini ni и ni ni ni ni ni ni
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
1.00
-1.00
1.00
-1.00
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
0.50
0.25
0.00
-0.25
-0.50
4n | |||
vj ∣ v |
⅛W V | ||
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii |
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll |
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii | |
Дл J |
∖M⅞W⅜, f ∖p |
A∕V | |
^j Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1990 1991 1992 |
γV llllllllllllllllllllllll |
1∏⅛∣ ιιιιlιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιιι 1995 1996 1997 |
Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii |
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
3. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
4. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
5. The name is absent
6. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
7. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
8. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
9. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
10. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA