Real Exchange Rate Misalignment: Prelude to Crisis?



presented in section 9, would not forecast a currency crisis. Section 10 provides a summary and
conclusions.

2. Exchange Rate Misalignments and Currency Crisis

Real exchange rate misalignment is defined as the difference between the long run
equilibrium real exchange rate and the prevailing real exchange rate. However, measurement of
the equilibrium real exchange rate is difficult since it is generally unobservable. A common
approach to such measurement begins with the notion of purchasing power parity (PPP).6 In the
analysis of transition economies this approach is problematic since an equilibrium period is
difficult to identify and productivity and other transition shocks may cause significant changes in
the equilibrium real exchange rate. Despite the weaknesses of the PPP approach it has been
employed by Barlow and Radulescu (2002), Barlow (2003) and Christev and Noorbakhsh (2000)
with mixed results. The real exchange rate is compatible with purchasing power parity in some
countries in certain time periods, but not consistently.

Further there were many factors at work during the transition period not typically
included in either the absolute or relative PPP model. For example, productivity growth
differentials were found to be an important determinant of the exchange rate by Richard and
Tersman (1996), Balazs (2002), de Broeck and Slok (2001) Halpern and Wyplosz (1997) and

6 A representative bundle of goods should cost the same regardless of currency and country (the ‘law of one price’
or perfect commodity arbitrage holds) and the absolute ‘purchasing power parity exchange rate’ between any two
currencies is the one that ensures the bundle of goods has the same price across countries. In reality this rate is not
likely to prevail because of differences in representative commodity bundles, transportation costs, tariffs and other
barriers to trade, imperfect or incomplete markets, and imperfect information,
inter alia. If these factors are held
constant and a period in which the economy is at equilibrium can be identified, the notion of relative purchasing
power parity defines the equilibrium real exchange rate in the current period as the rate observed in the equilibrium
period, adjusting for the cumulative inflation differential since that time (Williamson, 1994).



More intriguing information

1. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
2. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
3. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
4. The name is absent
5. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning
6. The name is absent
7. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
8. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
9. Endogenous Determination of FDI Growth and Economic Growth:The OECD Case
10. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
11. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
12. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
13. Global Excess Liquidity and House Prices - A VAR Analysis for OECD Countries
14. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
15. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
16. Social Balance Theory
17. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
18. The name is absent
19. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
20. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries