Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation



wn ∕ws :


' Φn (»)J/<1-a) dr
fà Φn (rΓw^rt Φs (≈)σ dr

(15)


First, note that ∂ω∕∂φN (r) > 0 and ∂ω∕∂φs (r) < 0∙ Intuitively, the relative wage
is proportional to the exogenous productivity of the two regions,
Φn and Ss∙ More
important, the Appendix shows that the sectoral pro
hle of technology is optimal for
the North, in the sense that it maximizes
Yn, and is appropriate for the South only in
the limit case when the two regions have the same sectoral distribution of
φ s (r) =
αφN (r), i, with α equal to a constant of proportionality^19 This result mirrors, in a
different setup, that of Acemoglu and Zilibotti (2001)∙ Further, the Appendix shows
that
σ (0,1) ω is bounded by max {Φn (r) Φs (r)} = Φn (0) Φs (0)∙ Lastly, since
growth is due to the expansion of the
a(ι) that are identical across countries, equation
(14) for the North gives also the growth rate of the South∙

Consider now the case of imperfect protection of IPRs in the South∙ To keep the
analysis a simple as possible, assume that the owner of a patent can extract only
a fraction
θ of the profits generated by its patent in the South∙2° Therefore, θ can
be interpreted as an index of the strength of IPRs protection∙ The pro
fitability of
an innovation is now the sum of the rents generated both in the North and in the
South, and the marginal condition for buying innovations becomes:

∂∏N (Г)
а (r)


∂∏S (r) "I 1 =
да (r)   r ^

Substituting the expressions for profits and solving for a (r) yields:

a (r) =


LnΦn (r)σ (wn)1~σ + ΘLsΦs (r)σ (ws)1~σ 1 ɪʌɪ '


(16)


in poor countries. This trade-off, studied extensively in the literature, is particularly important for
welfare analysis, which is not the main concern of the paper. On the contrary, positive rents from
innovation in the South are crucial to study the case of partial protection of IPRs. This latter case
seems realistic, since companies do receive royalties from developing countries.

19Remember that it is optimal to have high quality machines in sectors where the exogenous
productivity is already high. Copying the technology from the North, the South is using high
quality machines in sectors that are originally not productive. This ine
fficiency lowers the wage in
the South.

20This description of IPRs is both simple and general. It can also capture practices such as
licensing, where rent sharing is necessary to deter default or imitation on behalf of the licensee. See
Yang and Maskus (2001) on this.

12



More intriguing information

1. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
2. The name is absent
3. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
4. Job quality and labour market performance
5. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
6. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
7. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
8. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
9. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
10. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?