Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation



to cease. Note that this result, like Proposition 1, requires σ0 (i.e., an elasticity
of substitution between goods larger than one): with
σ = 0 the cut-off commodity
z and the wage ratio ω would not depend on technology, because every country
and sector would bene
fit equally from any improvement in a(i), and (23) would not
depend on
θ. Also, sector-specific technical process is a key assumption for deriving
Proposition 2. In a setup with factor-speci
fic innovations, as in Acemoglu and Zili-
botti (200
1), the market size for any innovation depends on exogenous endowments
that are una
ffected by specialization and trade: for this reason, incentives to invest
in R&D would never go to zero even if
θ = 0.21

Comparing the growth rate in free trade, (23), and autarky, (14), and noting
that (23) is a continuous function of
θ with limθ→θ*>θ gFT = 0, proves the following:

Proposition 2 For any σ (0,1), there exists a level θ such that, if θθ, the
world growth rate is lower in free trade than in autarky.

What happens during the transitional dynamics from autarky to the free trade
equilibrium? Since technology adjusts slowly, initially the equilibrium is determined
by equations (
19) and (20) using the pre-trade values of α(z). In general, the wage in
both countries will jump up, as specialization increases the overall e
fficiency of the
whole economy. Then, if the instantaneous wage ratio falls short of its long run free-
trade value, there will be a period in which innovation is biased towards Northern
sectors. During the transition, the Northern relative wage will rise and at the same
time
firms will move to the South where production costs are lower. Note that in a
trading environment with asymmetric IPRs protection, divergence and stagnation
are closely related: it is the growing cost of production in the wealthier North that
induces the relocation of production towards the South (an important phenomenon
in recent years) which in turn makes more sectors subject to weak IPRs and lowers
the global incentives for innovation.

2.3 Why Are IPRs Not Protected in the South?

The previous analysis suggests that Southern countries may benefit from the en-
forcement of IPRs: it would attract more appropriate innovations and foster world
growth. It is then interesting to ask why these policies are often not adopted. A
first

21As a consequence, in Acemolgu and Zilibotti (2001) trade opening has no effect on the world
growth rate.

17



More intriguing information

1. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
2. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
3. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
7. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
8. The name is absent
9. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
10. Education Research Gender, Education and Development - A Partially Annotated and Selective Bibliography
11. The name is absent
12. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
13. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
14. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
15. From music student to professional: the process of transition
16. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
17. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
18. The name is absent
19. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
20. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“