Table 4: Bivariate Probit Model estimates
|
Exp. Sign |
Coe^. |
Std. Err. |
______z |
P value | |
|
IMF | |||||
|
BEF |
+ |
2.916 |
0.707 |
4.126 |
0.000 |
|
GDPPC |
— |
-0.0002 |
0.0002 |
-1.105 |
0.269 |
|
GDI |
— |
-3.926 |
1.997 |
-1.966 |
0.049 |
|
EDT |
+ |
-0.935 |
0.649 |
-1.439 |
0.150 |
|
GGC |
— |
-3.455 |
1.803 |
-1.916 |
0.055 |
|
EXP |
— |
-2.450 |
1.201 |
-2.040 |
0.041 |
|
BOP |
— |
-14.391 |
8.535 |
-1.686 |
0.092 |
|
IAR |
- |
-0.687 |
0.259 |
-2.648 |
0.008 |
|
CONS |
3.208 |
1.123 |
2.857 |
0.004 | |
|
DRES | |||||
|
GDPPC |
- |
-0.00004 |
0.0001 |
-0.313 |
0.754 |
|
GDI |
- |
-4.788 |
2.019 |
-2.372 |
0.018 |
|
EDT |
+ |
0.883 |
0.520 |
1.699 |
0.089 |
|
EXP |
— |
0.846 |
0.688 |
1.231 |
0.218 |
|
BOP |
— |
0.805 |
3.991 |
0.202 |
0.840 |
|
IAR |
+ |
3.226 |
1.348 |
2.393 |
0.017 |
|
IMF |
+ |
1.610 |
0.417 |
3.863 |
0.000 |
|
CONS |
-1.817 |
0.830 |
-2.189 |
0.029 | |
|
½ |
-3.272 |
0.074 |
-44.297 |
0.000 | |
|
Log-Likelihood |
-56.650 | ||||
|
Pseudo-R2_______ |
0.45 | ||||
|
No. observations |
93_______ |
28
More intriguing information
1. EFFICIENCY LOSS AND TRADABLE PERMITS2. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
3. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
4. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
5. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
6. The name is absent
7. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
8. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
9. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI
10. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping