Table 4: Bivariate Probit Model estimates
Exp. Sign |
Coe^. |
Std. Err. |
______z |
P value | |
IMF | |||||
BEF |
+ |
2.916 |
0.707 |
4.126 |
0.000 |
GDPPC |
— |
-0.0002 |
0.0002 |
-1.105 |
0.269 |
GDI |
— |
-3.926 |
1.997 |
-1.966 |
0.049 |
EDT |
+ |
-0.935 |
0.649 |
-1.439 |
0.150 |
GGC |
— |
-3.455 |
1.803 |
-1.916 |
0.055 |
EXP |
— |
-2.450 |
1.201 |
-2.040 |
0.041 |
BOP |
— |
-14.391 |
8.535 |
-1.686 |
0.092 |
IAR |
- |
-0.687 |
0.259 |
-2.648 |
0.008 |
CONS |
3.208 |
1.123 |
2.857 |
0.004 | |
DRES | |||||
GDPPC |
- |
-0.00004 |
0.0001 |
-0.313 |
0.754 |
GDI |
- |
-4.788 |
2.019 |
-2.372 |
0.018 |
EDT |
+ |
0.883 |
0.520 |
1.699 |
0.089 |
EXP |
— |
0.846 |
0.688 |
1.231 |
0.218 |
BOP |
— |
0.805 |
3.991 |
0.202 |
0.840 |
IAR |
+ |
3.226 |
1.348 |
2.393 |
0.017 |
IMF |
+ |
1.610 |
0.417 |
3.863 |
0.000 |
CONS |
-1.817 |
0.830 |
-2.189 |
0.029 | |
½ |
-3.272 |
0.074 |
-44.297 |
0.000 | |
Log-Likelihood |
-56.650 | ||||
Pseudo-R2_______ |
0.45 | ||||
No. observations |
93_______ |
28
More intriguing information
1. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?2. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
3. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
4. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
5. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica
6. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters