Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?



Inequalities in (15) show that a home tariff raises output per firm in the domestic country and
lowers output per firm in the foreign country. Similarly, a foreign tariff raises output per firm in
the foreign country and lowers output per firm in the domestic country. The intuition is that a
home tariff raises the marginal cost of foreign exporting firms, forcing them to lower output to
raise marginal revenue and restore the equality between marginal cost and marginal revenue. In
turn, foreign firms’ contraction allows domestic firms to expand.

To sum up, competition a` la Cournot in the context of segmented markets implies that unilateral
trade liberalization by the domestic country reduces firm size and scale efficiency in the domestic
country and raises scale efficiency in the foreign country.
9 This result may help explain why
empirical studies often find that increased import competition due to unilateral trade liberalization
reduces firm size in developing countries.

Head and Ries (1999) test the implications of this model using a panel of 230 Canadian 4-digit
SIC industries for the period 1987-1994. The focus of their empirical analysis is on the effects on
firm size of the 1988 Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, which led to a gradual bilateral tariff
removal between the two countries. Their basic regression equation is:

ln qit = ai + βt + γCAτ CA + γ US τ US + eit                     (16)

where qit is average output per plant in the ith industry at time t, αi and βt are industry and time
fixed effects, respectively, τ
iCtA and τ iUtS are the industry tariff rates charged by the Canadian and
U.S. governments, respectively, and
eit is an error term. Regression results show that Canadian
tariff reductions lowered plant scale in Canada, while U.S. tariff reductions had the opposite effect.
Both effects are highly significant and quite large in magnitude. For instance, estimated coefficients
imply that the average reduction of Canadian tariffs by of 5.4% caused a 6.1% scale reduction in
Canada, while the average reduction of U.S. tariffs by 2.8% caused a 4.6% scale increase in Canada.

An other interesting result is that tariff effects are smaller in industries characterized by high

9 Head and Ries (1999) show that this result holds also under the assumption of free entry of firms.

20



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
3. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
4. The name is absent
5. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
6. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
7. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
8. The name is absent
9. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
10. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
11. The name is absent
12. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
13. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
14. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
15. Insurance within the firm
16. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
17. The name is absent
18. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
19. The name is absent
20. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA