Table 2: Results for the structural model
Parameter |
Ex. Variable |
Drinking |
Smoking | ||
Estimate S |
t. Error |
Estimate S |
t. Error | ||
γa |
fitted smoking |
0.089** |
0.024 |
- |
- |
γc |
fitted drinking |
- |
- |
-0.224** |
0.049 |
father monthly drinker |
1.947** |
0.299 |
- |
- | |
father weekly drinker |
3.399** |
0.323 |
- |
- | |
father daily drinker |
4.293** |
0.371 |
- |
- | |
δa |
mother monthly drinker |
2.994** |
0.276 |
- |
- |
mother weekly drinker |
4.707** |
0.404 |
- |
- | |
mother daily drinker |
4.587** |
0.513 |
- |
- | |
father ex-smoker |
- |
- |
3.775** |
0.440 | |
X |
father smoker |
- |
- |
7.222** |
0.408 |
δc |
mother ex-smoker |
- |
- |
3.063** |
0.420 |
mother smoker |
- |
- |
7.604** |
0.353 | |
constant |
-5.234** |
1.947 |
-37.053** |
2.387 | |
year 1986 |
-2.491** |
0.358 |
-4.515** |
0.482 | |
year 1990 |
-2.655** |
0.340 |
-5.649** |
0.453 | |
year 1992 |
-7.136** |
0.590 |
-7.366** |
0.892 | |
west |
-7.751** |
0.478 |
-1.618* |
0.753 | |
female |
-10.841** |
0.253 |
-6.957** |
0.639 | |
age |
1.915** |
0.155 |
3.763** |
0.202 | |
age2/100 |
-2.631** |
0.281 |
-6.230** |
0.361 | |
parents married |
0.016 |
0.271 |
-2.171** |
0.388 | |
father has low degree |
0.808* |
0.324 |
-0.325 |
0.463 | |
β |
father has medium degree |
0.559 |
0.379 |
-0.758 |
0.647 |
father has high degree |
0.191 |
0.601 |
-1.951 |
1.001 | |
father has uni degree |
1.176** |
0.432 |
-2.296** |
0.664 | |
mother has low degree |
-0.102 |
0.270 |
-0.575 |
0.333 | |
mother has medium degree |
0.039 |
0.341 |
-0.547 |
0.491 | |
mother has high degree |
-0.732 |
0.860 |
-3.028** |
0.957 | |
mother has uni degree |
0.085 |
0.560 |
-2.144* |
0.884 | |
grown up with mother |
-1.653* |
0.674 |
-5.111** |
0.854 | |
grown up with father |
-3.898** |
1.232 |
-6.899** |
1.537 | |
grown up with both |
1.078 |
1.150 |
1.128 |
1.515 | |
no. children at parents home |
0.045 |
0.084 |
0.681** |
0.093 | |
LR-statistic |
4362.324 |
2400.042 | |||
number of obs. |
25695 |
26353 | |||
ovi-test |
________0.489 |
0.000 |
Notes: ** significant at the the 1% level; * significant at the the 5% level; bootstrapped
st. errors (100 repetitions); “ovi-test” indicates p-values for testing over-identifying restrictions.
17
More intriguing information
1. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb2. The name is absent
3. Valuing Farm Financial Information
4. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
5. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
6. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
10. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent