Wilson’s essential trick is to iterate on this relation, which is supposed to
converge rapidly [9, 60], assuming that for KR near KC , we take
Ke/2 ≈ Kc + (K - Ke)Rzf (R)y.
(13)
We next proceed in two steps, first solving this for f(R) in terms of known
values, and then solving for R, finding a value Rc which we then substitute
into the first of equations (3) to obtain an expression for H [K, 0] in terms of
known functions and parameter values.
The first step gives the general result
f(Rc)
[(KC∕(KC - K))]1/y
21/y RC/y
c
(14)
Solving this for Rc and substituting into the first of equation(3) gives
H [K, 0]≈ HK^
f(Rc)
Ho
f (Re)
χ(K, 0) ≈ χ(Ke/2,0)Re = χoRe
(15)
26
More intriguing information
1. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
5. The name is absent
6. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
7. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
8. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
9. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
10. The name is absent