Wilson’s essential trick is to iterate on this relation, which is supposed to
converge rapidly [9, 60], assuming that for KR near KC , we take
Ke/2 ≈ Kc + (K - Ke)Rzf (R)y.
(13)
We next proceed in two steps, first solving this for f(R) in terms of known
values, and then solving for R, finding a value Rc which we then substitute
into the first of equations (3) to obtain an expression for H [K, 0] in terms of
known functions and parameter values.
The first step gives the general result
f(Rc)
[(KC∕(KC - K))]1/y
21/y RC/y
c
(14)
Solving this for Rc and substituting into the first of equation(3) gives
H [K, 0]≈ HK^
f(Rc)
Ho
f (Re)
χ(K, 0) ≈ χ(Ke/2,0)Re = χoRe
(15)
26
More intriguing information
1. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?2. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-2004
3. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
4. Fertility in Developing Countries
5. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
6. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
7. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
8. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
9. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
10. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS