Wilson’s essential trick is to iterate on this relation, which is supposed to
converge rapidly [9, 60], assuming that for KR near KC , we take
Ke/2 ≈ Kc + (K - Ke)Rzf (R)y.
(13)
We next proceed in two steps, first solving this for f(R) in terms of known
values, and then solving for R, finding a value Rc which we then substitute
into the first of equations (3) to obtain an expression for H [K, 0] in terms of
known functions and parameter values.
The first step gives the general result
f(Rc)
[(KC∕(KC - K))]1/y
21/y RC/y
c
(14)
Solving this for Rc and substituting into the first of equation(3) gives
H [K, 0]≈ HK^
f(Rc)
Ho
f (Re)
χ(K, 0) ≈ χ(Ke/2,0)Re = χoRe
(15)
26
More intriguing information
1. Fertility in Developing Countries2. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects
3. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
4. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
5. The name is absent
6. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
7. The name is absent
8. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
9. The name is absent
10. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?