A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions



Scott JR, Gunderson CA. A study of prospective ophthalmology
residents’ career perceptions.

Med Educ Online [serial online] 2003;8:9. Available from
http://www.med-ed-online.org

The Critical Factors assessed by the survey
included

Autonomy - amount of autonomy;

Time - the amount of time applicant
expected to spend directly seeing and caring
for patient:

Continuity - the degree of continuity of care
anticipated with patients;

Routine/Diversity - extent to which similar
or different tasks are preferred;

Family/Leisure - amount of time spent with
family or in leisure activities;

Expertise - anticipated level of expertise
(i.e., general or sharply defined);

Income - income level compared to other
specialties;

Innovation - amount of innovation required;

Intellectual - specific versus theoretical
problem solving approach preferred;

Physician Interaction - amount of time
interacting with other physicians;

Manual/Mechanical - extent to which
manual/mechanical activities are preferred;

Pressure - amount of pressure anticipated
dealing with crises, scheduling conflicts, and
patient decisions;

Responsibility - degree of responsibility
expected to assume;

Schedule - regularity of work hours;

Security - anticipated job security and
confidence in income;

•  End Results - extent to which work provides

opportunity to see end results;

Status - rating of status compared to other
specialties;

Computer/Technology - extent to which
computer based technologies will impact
work; and

Family Influence - extent to which family
and personal values determine career
decisions.

Critical Factors were divided into four broad
categories: Career-oriented issues; Personal-family
issues; Financial issues; and Gender-related issues.
Career-oriented issues included time, continuity,
expertise, physician interaction, manual/mechanical,
pressure, schedule, end results, status, and
computer/technology. Personal-family issues
consisted of autonomy, routine/diversity,
family/leisure, innovation, intellectual, responsibility,
and family influence while Financial issues included
income and job security.

An initial e-mail survey was sent April 2002
with a second e-mail submission to non-responders
by June 2002. Responses by the residency candidates
(n= 42) were then compared to the responses of
practicing ophthalmologists (n = 56) who completed
the original instrument administered by the AMA.
Regrettably, no other data was available regarding
AMA practicing physician scores (e.g.,
demographics; practice patterns; etc.). A one-sample
t-test was used to compare means for critical factor

Table 1. Ethnicity Categories of Respondents (n= 42)

Ethnicity




More intriguing information

1. Markets for Influence
2. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia
3. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
4. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
5. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China
6. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-2004
7. The name is absent
8. Anti Microbial Resistance Profile of E. coli isolates From Tropical Free Range Chickens
9. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
10. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry