stage, and concluded ‘Just over three-quarters of the children expressing an intention
in year 7 carried out that intention post-16’ (p.406). This sounds impressive evidence
for the accuracy of early intentions, and indeed this apparently high level of accuracy
forms the basis for his whole paper.
Table 1 - Reported intentions for post-16 participation, year 7 pupils
Stay on |
Leave |
Don’t know |
Total |
725 |
ЇЇ8 |
238 |
1081 |
Source: Croll (2010, p.406)
Croll does not say exactly how many of the 1,081 pupils in Table 1 did indeed stay
on, and this is an important piece of data missing from the paper, and from his
consideration of the meaning of the 75.9% ‘accuracy’ figure. However, the overall
staying on rate for the various panels he considers (totalling 1,715 individual pupils)
is 71.6% (p.406), so let us assume that this is something like the true figure for the
1,081 pupils questioned in year 7. In fact, 72% could be an underestimate of the
population figure for Britain, which has been over 70% participation in full-time
education post-16 for many years now, topped up by others participating in part-time
education, plus employer and government-funded training schemes (Gorard et al.
2007). By ignoring those replying ‘don’t know’ in Table 1, like Croll, we end up with
843 pupils in year 7 (1081-238), of whom 86% (725/843) reported an intention to stay
on in education. So now we have the three numeric parameters we need to make a
judgement about the claim to accuracy. In this study, 86% of year 7 pupils intended to
stay on, around 72% did so and, added to those intending not to stay on and not
staying on in fact, these intentions are 76% accurate. The first thing to notice, of
course, is the imbalance in the two prior figures. A clear majority of pupils intend to
stay on and a clear majority do so. Table 2 summarises this imbalance. It also divides
pupils into a notional 72% ‘observed’ to stay on and 28% observed to leave for both
those pupils intending to stay on and those intending to leave. In other words, Table 2
provides the baseline of frequencies that would be expected if intention in Year 7 and
participation after Year 12 were completely unrelated.
Table 2 - Assessing the accuracy of intentions if participation is unrelated
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
3. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
7. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
8. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
9. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
10. The name is absent