Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll



stage, and concluded ‘Just over three-quarters of the children expressing an intention
in year 7 carried out that intention post-16’ (p.406). This sounds impressive evidence
for the accuracy of early intentions, and indeed this apparently high level of accuracy
forms the basis for his whole paper.

Table 1 - Reported intentions for post-16 participation, year 7 pupils

Stay on

Leave

Don’t know

Total

725

ЇЇ8

238

1081

Source: Croll (2010, p.406)

Croll does not say exactly how many of the 1,081 pupils in Table 1 did indeed stay
on, and this is an important piece of data missing from the paper, and from his
consideration of the meaning of the 75.9% ‘accuracy’ figure. However, the overall
staying on rate for the various panels he considers (totalling 1,715 individual pupils)
is 71.6% (p.406), so let us assume that this is something like the true figure for the
1,081 pupils questioned in year 7. In fact, 72% could be an underestimate of the
population figure for Britain, which has been over 70% participation in full-time
education post-16 for many years now, topped up by others participating in part-time
education, plus employer and government-funded training schemes (Gorard et al.
2007). By ignoring those replying ‘don’t know’ in Table 1, like Croll, we end up with
843 pupils in year 7 (1081-238), of whom 86% (725/843) reported an intention to stay
on in education. So now we have the three numeric parameters we need to make a
judgement about the claim to accuracy. In this study, 86% of year 7 pupils intended to
stay on, around 72% did so and, added to those intending not to stay on and not
staying on in fact, these intentions are 76% accurate. The first thing to notice, of
course, is the imbalance in the two prior figures. A clear majority of pupils intend to
stay on and a clear majority do so. Table 2 summarises this imbalance. It also divides
pupils into a notional 72% ‘observed’ to stay on and 28% observed to leave for both
those pupils intending to stay on and those intending to leave. In other words, Table 2
provides the baseline of frequencies that would be expected if intention in Year 7 and
participation after Year 12 were completely unrelated.

Table 2 - Assessing the accuracy of intentions if participation is unrelated



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Locke's theory of perception
6. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
7. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
8. The name is absent
9. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
10. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
11. The name is absent
12. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
13. The name is absent
14. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
15. La mobilité de la main-d'œuvre en Europe : le rôle des caractéristiques individuelles et de l'hétérogénéité entre pays
16. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
17. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
18. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
19. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
20. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS