The name is absent



conflicting moral judgments; that there is no method for resolving these conflicts that all would
find persuasive; and that these conflicts reflect conflicting obligations. Only the third claim is
wholly normative, the other two being open to empirical scrutiny. Let us consider pluralism and
absolutism more closely to see how cognitive science can be relevant in judging them.

Defining Moral Diversity and Pluralism

In defining pluralism, it is useful to note that some moral principles are more basic for an
agent than others. One may hold to the principle that it is wrong to gossip maliciously, but this
would not be a basic moral principle for a typical person. For most agents, the prohibition
against malicious gossip probably flows from some more general principle, (say) that suffering
should be minimized, in conjunction with some descriptive claim, (say) that malicious gossip
runs a great risk of increasing suffering. A moral principle is
basic for an agent if the agent
would not try to justify it by appeal to any other moral principle (whether in conjunction with a
descriptive claim or not) (Brandt, 1984).

According to strong moral pluralism, for any humanly possible basic moral principle, it is
humanly possible
that there is some other basic moral principle which conflicts with it such that
there would be no unanimous consent for resolving the dispute no matter how much information,
time, and leisure were available. The expression “humanly possible” is used to show that mature,
biologically normal humans are at issue. “Unanimous consent” refers to the community of all
humans and obviously indicates an ideal, since a conference of our whole species is infeasible.
The second occurrence of the phrase “it is humanly possible” is italicized to stress that this strong
pluralism can be true even if there is some basic moral principle which everyone
happens to
accept. It is the mere possibility of irresolvable conflict which pluralism requires. Furthermore,
the word “any” is italicized to stress that there is no humanly possible basic principle immune to



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
3. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
4. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
5. The name is absent
6. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
7. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
8. The name is absent
9. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
10. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
11. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
12. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
13. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
14. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
15. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
16. The name is absent
17. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
18. Ahorro y crecimiento: alguna evidencia para la economía argentina, 1970-2004
19. The name is absent
20. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)