Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education



12


Wallhead and Ntoumanis

Table 2 Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficients (M ± SD) for Pre- and
Postintervention Measured Dependent Variables for Both Programs

Sport Education Traditional

Dependent
variable

(n = 26)

(n = 25)

a

M

SD

M

SD

Enjoyment

Pre

4.51

1.21

5.25

0.93

0.73

Post

5.60**

0.75

5.13

0.89

0.81

Effort

Pre

5.14

0.94

5.62

0.74

0.76

Post

5.73**

1.03

5.45

1.03

0.70

Perceived competence

Pre

4.82

0.84

4.76

1.30

0.70

Post

5.45

1.04

4.81

1.15

0.79

Task goal orientation

Pre

3.72

0.53

4.09

0.56

0.73

Post

4.11

0.61

3.96

0.59

0.82

Ego goal orientation

Pre

2.84

0.70

2.57

1.04

0.84

Post

2.50

0.79

2.31

0.82

0.88

Task climate

Pre

3.74

0.51

3.97

0.62

0.72

Post

3.91

0.47

3.71

0.68

0.70

Ego climate

Pre

2.98

0.46

3.01

0.64

0.61

Post

2.98

0.44

2.87

0.41

0.65

Perceived autonomy

Pre

6.93

3.08

4.91

7.44

0.81

Post

7.63

2.92

4.63

5.74

0.73

** p < .006.

autonomy were each entered into a regression model in the first block of the analy-
sis to control for the initial level of these variables. In the second block,
postintervention goal orientations, perception of the motivational climate, and per-
ceived autonomy were entered as independent variables into the model.

Results

Preliminary Analyses

Cronbach alpha coefficients, means, and standard deviations for all mea-
sures are displayed in Table 2. The alpha coefficients for all measures were deemed
acceptable based on Nunnally’s (1978) cutoff criterion of .70 for the psychological
domain with the exception of ego-involving climate (pre
α = .61, post α = .65).
However, due to the importance of this measure for this study, the subscale was
retained.

According to Kenny and La Voie (1985), in order to determine whether the
individual or the group should be used as the unit of analysis, a test of non-
independence of individual observations must be performed. The calculation of
an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) provides evidence of the degree of vari-
ance in responses among members of a group in relation to the responses of
nongroup members (Zhang, Hausenblas, Barkouras, & Pease, 2002). Intraclass



More intriguing information

1. Job quality and labour market performance
2. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
3. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
4. The name is absent
5. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
6. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
7. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
8. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
9. The name is absent
10. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
14. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
15. The Shepherd Sinfonia
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)
19. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
20. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI