A Grid Cell Input

C Random Rotation Output
D PCA Output
E SFA Output

Figure 1: A: Spatial firing pattern (SFP) of the input units representing grid-cells. Three
out of 100 units are shown. B: SFP of six out of 100 output units, computed by independent
component analysis as a means of Sparsification. Units are ordered by decreasing sparseness
(kurtosis). Place fields of sparser units tend to have higher peak activity and are more often
located at the border of the enclosure, whereas less sparse units tend to have multiple place
fields. C: SFP of three out of 100 typical output units computed by random mixtures of the
inputs. D: SFP of 1st, 50th, and IOOth output computed by principal component analysis. E:
SFP of 1st, 50th and IOOth output computed by Slow Feature Analysis. Activities are color
coded: red-high, green-medium, blue-zero activity. The full set of results can be viewed at
http: / /itb.biologie.hu-berlin.de / ~franzius/gridsToPlaces /
More intriguing information
1. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations2. The name is absent
3. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
4. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
5. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
6. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
7. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
8. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
9. The Complexity Era in Economics
10. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources