|
• |
A |
M |
J |
H | |
|
A |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 | |
|
F irst = |
M |
. |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
J |
. |
. |
0 |
1 | |
|
H |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
(7)
|
respectively, where A, M, . . . are short |
for ’Alf’, ’must’. |
The matrices corre- |
|
sponding to the other four binary branched trees are |
(compare Haegeman | |
|
(1994) p.141&142 [13] diagrams 84b,c,d, |
e): | |
|
•A |
MJH | |
|
A0 |
333 | |
|
S econd = M . |
022 |
(8) |
|
J. |
.01 | |
|
H. |
..0 | |
|
•A |
MJH | |
|
A0 |
333 | |
|
T hird = M . |
012 |
(9) |
|
J. |
.01 | |
|
H. |
..0 | |
|
•A |
MJH | |
|
A0 |
223 | |
|
F ourth = M . |
013 |
(10) |
|
J. |
.03 | |
|
H. |
..0 | |
|
•A |
MJH | |
|
A0 |
123 | |
|
Fifth = M . |
023 |
(11) |
|
J. |
.03 | |
|
H. |
..0 | |
There are two 3-ary trees with matrices (compare Haegeman (1994) p.142 [13]
diagrams 84g and 84h):
|
• |
A |
M |
J |
H | ||
|
A |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 | ||
|
Sixth = |
M |
. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
(12) |
|
J |
. |
. |
0 |
2 | ||
|
H |
. |
. |
. |
0 | ||
|
• |
A |
M |
J |
H | ||
|
A |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 | ||
|
S eventh = |
M |
. |
0 |
1 |
1 |
(13) |
|
J |
. |
. |
0 |
1 | ||
|
H |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
More intriguing information
1. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis2. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
3. Midwest prospects and the new economy
4. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
5. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
6. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
7. The name is absent
8. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
9. Explaining Growth in Dutch Agriculture: Prices, Public R&D, and Technological Change
10. The name is absent