• |
A |
M |
J |
H | |
A |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 | |
F irst = |
M |
. |
0 |
2 |
2 |
J |
. |
. |
0 |
1 | |
H |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
(7)
respectively, where A, M, . . . are short |
for ’Alf’, ’must’. |
The matrices corre- |
sponding to the other four binary branched trees are |
(compare Haegeman | |
(1994) p.141&142 [13] diagrams 84b,c,d, |
e): | |
•A |
MJH | |
A0 |
333 | |
S econd = M . |
022 |
(8) |
J. |
.01 | |
H. |
..0 | |
•A |
MJH | |
A0 |
333 | |
T hird = M . |
012 |
(9) |
J. |
.01 | |
H. |
..0 | |
•A |
MJH | |
A0 |
223 | |
F ourth = M . |
013 |
(10) |
J. |
.03 | |
H. |
..0 | |
•A |
MJH | |
A0 |
123 | |
Fifth = M . |
023 |
(11) |
J. |
.03 | |
H. |
..0 |
There are two 3-ary trees with matrices (compare Haegeman (1994) p.142 [13]
diagrams 84g and 84h):
• |
A |
M |
J |
H | ||
A |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 | ||
Sixth = |
M |
. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
(12) |
J |
. |
. |
0 |
2 | ||
H |
. |
. |
. |
0 | ||
• |
A |
M |
J |
H | ||
A |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 | ||
S eventh = |
M |
. |
0 |
1 |
1 |
(13) |
J |
. |
. |
0 |
1 | ||
H |
. |
. |
. |
0 |
More intriguing information
1. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions2. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
3. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
4. The name is absent
5. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
6. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
7. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
8. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
9. The name is absent
10. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke