An Attempt to 6
observations. Therefore, it was rational to
double random sample the data for the reliability and
validity of observation. First, the number of the
sessions(1-37) were randomized and then the
randomized order was fifty-fifty randomized. After
that the queues were multiplied that resulted in 13
sessions for assessing the reliability and validity
from the matrix of all the category frequencies. The
discrete time was in the columns.
Corelations were calculated between the
columns. The correlations in the matrix were
squared. A procedure that resulted in common
variances in the off-diagonal cells when nulls
replaced the ones in the diagonal cells. Application
of the formula (Nunnally, 1967, p. 195,6-23)to the
common variance matrix minus the diagonal sum of the
ones gave a value of 0.94 for the coefficient of
reliability of observation.
On the contrary, a validity measure was a more
complex one. The question was much about: are the
frequencies in the categories where they are to be.
So the maximum differentiation between the categories
More intriguing information
1. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories2. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
3. Voting by Committees under Constraints
4. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen
8. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
9. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
10. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany