Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)



M Meenakshisundaram & K Santhaguru / Int J Cur Sci Res. 2011; 1(2): 23 - 30.

28


Table 4. Effect of AM fungi & Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus inoculation on P, Soluble sugars, Chlorophyll content of Sorghum bicolor
grown in sterile soil-sand mixture at 35 DAI .

Treatments

P(mg g dry wt-1)

Soluble sugars (mg g dry wt-1)

Chl (mg g fr leaf-1)

Control

6.01a ± 0.817

12.40a ±0.058

1.220a ± 0.147

Entrophospora infrequens

10.00c ± 0.236

17.50e ±0.250

1.937bcde ± 0.105

Gigaspora albida

13.50g ± 0.331

19.90hi ±0.156

3.555g ± 0.409

Glomus albida

12.40ef ±0.285

19.20ef ±0.213

2.446ef ± 0.267

Glomus dimorphicum

14.50h ±0.389

20.50ij ±0.064

4.159hi ± 0.355

Glomus tubaeformis

16.00i ± 0.264

21.10jk ±0.185

4.283ij ± 0.518

Glomusfasciculatum

21.00n ± 0.476

22.30m ±0.171

4.518ij ± 0.290

Glomus mosseae

18.10jk ±0.498

21.60klm±0.16

4.353ij ± 0.508

Glomus macrocarpum

11.00d ± 0.314

018.60fg ± 0.287

2.161abcd ± 0.138

Scutellospora heterogamma

7.30b ± 0.235

15.20c ± 0.288

1.480ab ± 0.085

Sclerocystis pachycaulis

9.00c ± 0.264

16.20d ± 0.275

1.617abc ± 0.103

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus

8.10b ± 0.246

13.80b ±0.212

1.745abcd ± 0.409

+ Entrophospora infrequens

16.30i ± 0.071

18.70fg±0.043

2.432ef ± 0.146

+ Gigaspora albida

19.20kl ±0.052

20.60ijk±0.065

4.431ij ± 0.531

+ Glomus albida

18.70kl ±0.043

19.90hi ±0.047

3.657gh ± 0.407

+ Glomus dimorphicum

19.90Lm±0.04

21.30jkl±0.045

4.707ij± 0.355

+ Glomus tubaeformis

720.60mn±0.065

22.20Lm±0.050

4.680ij ± 0.407

+ Glomusfasciculatum

25.40o ± 0.692

25.10o ± 0.165

5.727k ± 0.407

+ Glomus mosseae

21.30n ± 0.045

23.40n ± 0.156

4.955j ±  0.576

+ Glomus macrocarpum

17.80j ± 0.065

19.20gh ±0.052

2.858f ± 0.354

+ Scutellospora heterogamma

12.06de ±0.226

16.30d ± 0.071

2.146cde ± 0.172

+ Sclerocystis pachycaulis

13.30fg ±0.481

17.80fg ±0.065

2.247de ± 0.309

LSD( P< 0.05)

247.40

102.32

51.15**

± Standard deviation .Means followed by a common alphabet within a column are not significantly different at 5 % level of DMRT.

*Significant

**Highly significant



More intriguing information

1. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
2. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
3. The name is absent
4. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
5. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
9. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
10. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach