Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)



M Meenakshisundaram & K Santhaguru / Int J Cur Sci Res. 2011; 1(2): 23 - 30.

28


Table 4. Effect of AM fungi & Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus inoculation on P, Soluble sugars, Chlorophyll content of Sorghum bicolor
grown in sterile soil-sand mixture at 35 DAI .

Treatments

P(mg g dry wt-1)

Soluble sugars (mg g dry wt-1)

Chl (mg g fr leaf-1)

Control

6.01a ± 0.817

12.40a ±0.058

1.220a ± 0.147

Entrophospora infrequens

10.00c ± 0.236

17.50e ±0.250

1.937bcde ± 0.105

Gigaspora albida

13.50g ± 0.331

19.90hi ±0.156

3.555g ± 0.409

Glomus albida

12.40ef ±0.285

19.20ef ±0.213

2.446ef ± 0.267

Glomus dimorphicum

14.50h ±0.389

20.50ij ±0.064

4.159hi ± 0.355

Glomus tubaeformis

16.00i ± 0.264

21.10jk ±0.185

4.283ij ± 0.518

Glomusfasciculatum

21.00n ± 0.476

22.30m ±0.171

4.518ij ± 0.290

Glomus mosseae

18.10jk ±0.498

21.60klm±0.16

4.353ij ± 0.508

Glomus macrocarpum

11.00d ± 0.314

018.60fg ± 0.287

2.161abcd ± 0.138

Scutellospora heterogamma

7.30b ± 0.235

15.20c ± 0.288

1.480ab ± 0.085

Sclerocystis pachycaulis

9.00c ± 0.264

16.20d ± 0.275

1.617abc ± 0.103

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus

8.10b ± 0.246

13.80b ±0.212

1.745abcd ± 0.409

+ Entrophospora infrequens

16.30i ± 0.071

18.70fg±0.043

2.432ef ± 0.146

+ Gigaspora albida

19.20kl ±0.052

20.60ijk±0.065

4.431ij ± 0.531

+ Glomus albida

18.70kl ±0.043

19.90hi ±0.047

3.657gh ± 0.407

+ Glomus dimorphicum

19.90Lm±0.04

21.30jkl±0.045

4.707ij± 0.355

+ Glomus tubaeformis

720.60mn±0.065

22.20Lm±0.050

4.680ij ± 0.407

+ Glomusfasciculatum

25.40o ± 0.692

25.10o ± 0.165

5.727k ± 0.407

+ Glomus mosseae

21.30n ± 0.045

23.40n ± 0.156

4.955j ±  0.576

+ Glomus macrocarpum

17.80j ± 0.065

19.20gh ±0.052

2.858f ± 0.354

+ Scutellospora heterogamma

12.06de ±0.226

16.30d ± 0.071

2.146cde ± 0.172

+ Sclerocystis pachycaulis

13.30fg ±0.481

17.80fg ±0.065

2.247de ± 0.309

LSD( P< 0.05)

247.40

102.32

51.15**

± Standard deviation .Means followed by a common alphabet within a column are not significantly different at 5 % level of DMRT.

*Significant

**Highly significant



More intriguing information

1. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
2. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
3. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
4. The name is absent
5. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
6. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
7. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
8. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
9. The name is absent
10. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
11. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
15. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
16. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
17. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
18. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
19. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
20. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies