Design and investigation of scalable multicast recursive protocols for wired and wireless ad hoc networks



[10] R. Boivie, Y. Imai, W. Livens, D. Ooms and O. Paridaens, Explicit Multicast:
Basic specification
, IETF draft-xcast-basic-spec-01. txt (2001).

[11] A. Boudani and B. Cousin, SEM: a new small group multicast routing protocol,
10th International Conference on Telecommunications., 2003, pp. 450- 455.

[12] J. Broch, D. A. Maltz, D. B. Johnson, Y. C. Hu and J. Jetcheva, A performance
comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols
, ACM Press
New York, NY, USA, 1998, pp. 85-97.

[13] T. Camp, J. Boleng and V. Davies, A survey of mobility models for ad hoc
network research
, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2 (2002),
pp. 483-502.

[14] T. Camp and Y. Liu, An adaptive mesh-based protocol for geocast routing,
Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 63 (2003), pp. 196-213.

[15] A. T. Campbell, J. Gomez, S. Kim, A. G. Valko, C. Y. Wan and Z. R. Turanyi,
Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Cellular IP, IEEE Personal
Communications, 7 (2000), pp. 42-49.

[16] I. D. Chakeres and E. M. Belding-Royer, AODV routing protocol implementation
design
, 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems
Workshops. (2004), pp. 698-703.

[17] C. C. Chiang, M. Gerla and L. Zhang, Forwarding Group Multicast Protocol
(FGMP) for multihop, mobile wireless networks
, Cluster Computing, 1 (1998),
pp. 187-196.

128



More intriguing information

1. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
2. Unemployment in an Interdependent World
3. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
4. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
5. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
6. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
7. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent