The name is absent



and, more recently, films such as WALL-E (2008, Staton) demonstrate how
‘perfectly real’ the artificial image can be, comparing it, simultaneously,
with lens generated images.

The distrust that animation and computer generated images promote
in audiences should not deny the potential benefits that they imply if we can
be in control of their confusing, perverse effects. In fact, technologically
created images promote the creation of unrealities that facilitate a possible
escape from the frustrating aspects of our reality; further, they function to
reveal things that are ordinarily hidden or unnoticed by our perception.
Computer generated images are able to express what is inexpressible by lens
generated images: the unreal aspects of reality. The paradox is that once we
overcome the distrust of the ‘new image’ there will be an open possibility to
reveal fears related to our society, technology and future. A film like
WALL-E,
over and above its status as a commercial, family entertainment product, is a
useful incipient example of this. In
WALL-E the most developed visual
technology is used to recreate the future, a future in which the environment
has been destroyed and the earth is inhabited only by machines. In this
space, in the non-place, humans live a passive life that technology has
physically degenerated, converting them into unthinking consumers who
simply assume the mandates coming from technology without questioning
them.

In WALL-E we can observe how digital media have now achieved pre-
manufactured and fabricated images with a similarity and fidelity to the
original never expected before. The direct consequence of the ability of
technology to create simulacra is that reality and fiction have been
(con)fused and the concept of authenticity is becoming irrelevant. In this
respect, we have to be aware that even if artificially generated images offer
us a more attractive version of reality, they are not ‘harmless’. The mere
substitution of reality means something in itself: it indicates that we are not
as far as we thought towards finding a habitable alternative to our world,
replacing ‘standard’ reality by its representation. We are in the process of
pronouncing that virtuality is the new reality.

- 46 -



More intriguing information

1. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
2. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
6. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
7. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices
8. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
15. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
16. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
17. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
18. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
19. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback
20. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY