The name is absent



pseudocomponent

___________3___________

mol wt Mj
[g/ɪɪɪol]

mass fraction of
pseudocomponent wpj

1

IOOO

Œ025

2

9500

0.096

3

19500

0.115

4

32500

0.14

5

50000

0.128

6

80000

0.16

7

137500

0.13

8

212500

0.06

9

325000

0.1

________10________

900000

__________0.046__________

Table 2.4: Molecular weight distribution of HDPE as characterized by Gross and Sad-
owski [48]

pseudocomponent

__________i__________

mol wt Mj
[g∕mol]

mass fraction of
pseudocomponent ww

1

432.23

~    0.043995541

2

27696

0.616896145

3

341590

0.317484536

4

2295800

0.021433497

5

11740000

0.000190184

__________6__________

55579000

_______9.73E-08_______

Table 2.5: Molecular weight distribution of HDPE as characterized by Tork et. al. [94]

docomponents. The new EOS is in better agreement with the experimental data as
compared to PC-SAFT. The liquid-liquid (LL) two phase domain is broader and the
predicted phase envelope is significantly closer to the experimental data at higher PE
concentrations. Thus the set of parameters for HDPE not only give better estimates
of its liquid densities in a wide range of pressure and temperature but also predict
better liquid-liquid phase behavior of HDPE in various solvents. This is a signifi-
cant improvement considering the industrial importance of predicting accurate phase
behavior of polymer systems.

59



More intriguing information

1. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
2. Moffett and rhetoric
3. Yield curve analysis
4. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
5. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
6. XML PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS FOR A COMPANY
7. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
8. The name is absent
9. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
10. The name is absent