The name is absent

pseudocomponent ___________3___________	mol wt Mj [g/ɪɪɪol]	mass fraction of pseudocomponent w_pj
1	IOOO	Œ025
2	9500	0.096
3	19500	0.115
4	32500	0.14
5	50000	0.128
6	80000	0.16
7	137500	0.13
8	212500	0.06
9	325000	0.1
________10________	900000	__________0.046__________

Table 2.4: Molecular weight distribution of HDPE as characterized by Gross and Sad-
owski [48]

pseudocomponent __________i__________	mol wt Mj [g∕mol]	mass fraction of pseudocomponent w_w∙
1	432.23	~ 0.043995541
2	27696	0.616896145
3	341590	0.317484536
4	2295800	0.021433497
5	11740000	0.000190184
__________6__________	55579000	_______9.73E-08_______

Table 2.5: Molecular weight distribution of HDPE as characterized by Tork et. al. [94]

docomponents. The new EOS is in better agreement with the experimental data as
compared to PC-SAFT. The liquid-liquid (LL) two phase domain is broader and the
predicted phase envelope is significantly closer to the experimental data at higher PE
concentrations. Thus the set of parameters for HDPE not only give better estimates
of its liquid densities in a wide range of pressure and temperature but also predict
better liquid-liquid phase behavior of HDPE in various solvents. This is a signifi-
cant improvement considering the industrial importance of predicting accurate phase
behavior of polymer systems.

More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
3. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
4. The name is absent
5. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
6. Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics
7. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
8. The name is absent
9. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
10. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School