38

measurements (n)
Figure 4.5 : The estimated thickness of the plastic plate, versus number of measure-
ments (n) used in CS reconstruction for the object in Figure 4.4. Dashed line indicates
the actual thickness difference (1.73 mm), as determined using a micrometer. The
thickness estimates rapidly converge to the correct answer with increasing n.
the amplitude image shows almost no contrast, the phase image shows a sharp con-
trast between the upper and lower halves of the rectangular aperture. The thickness
difference (∆d) can be estimated from the measured phase difference (Δ0) according
to ∆θ = ω^n~T^∙-ι which is valid since the plastic is essentially dispersionless. The ac-
quired data follows a linear relationship of ∆θ versus frequency, and the slope of that
line is used to estimate ∆d. Figure 4.5 shows the estimated value, for an increasing
number of CS measurements from 200 to 600. Compared to the value ∆d = 1.73 mm
determined with a micrometer, Figure 4.5 shows that the estimation results rapidly
converge to the correct answer, even for a small number of CS measurements. Another
reconstruction algorithm which assumes smoothness in the phase image yields even
better results [72]. Other recently developed algorithms for complex images might
even achieve better reconstruction results [73].
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
4. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
5. The name is absent
6. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
7. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
8. Menarchial Age of Secondary School Girls in Urban and Rural Areas of Rivers State, Nigeria
9. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
10. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE