43
= Λ f ⅛)exp(⅜ )θ'faj
j W ⅛l∑Lι^(¾)expW)/
and,
L∞(∕5) = ∏<⅝
J=I
ππ( ⅜-)exp(⅜ }d^
⅛MlΣLι^(¾)θχp(^)∫
where ʧɔ(/?) is the likelihood function for the time point xi.
To make the above equation well-defined, we need to make several adjustments.
First, we set P⅛(¾∙) = 1 for xi ≤ k. Because by definition, P⅛(¾) represents the
probability of the subject к survived at time Xj for Xj > k, given that it survives until
time k. That is for Xj ≤ k, the subject k survives, i.e. Pk(xj) = 1 ■
Second, please note that observations have been sorted in ascending order already.
That is, for i = 1,..., n, the subject i failed at time xi. Therefore, for a failed subject
j, we set Pi(xj) = 0 for j > i.
Third, regarding Di(xj) for a failed subject i, instead of using Equation 3.6, we
set Di(xi) = 1 and Di(xj) = 0 for j > i. That is, the subject i losses all of its unit
mass when it fails at time xi. As a result, a failed subject contributes only one time
in the extended Cox partial likelihood function.
The counterpart of the extended Cox partial likelihood function is shown below,
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
3. The name is absent
4. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
5. The name is absent
6. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
7. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
8. The name is absent
9. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
10. The name is absent