Table 3.2. Significant correlations between response variables. All correlations with
discovery and recruitment times were non-normal, and therefore the correlation value is
Spearman’s p. The Benjamini and Hochberg FDR method (Benjamini and Hochberg
1995) was used to correct for multiple comparisons. MW = mealworm and SW = sugar
water.
|
_______Variable 1________ |
_______Variable 2_______ |
Correlation |
p-value |
|
SW recruitment |
MW recruitment |
0.4977 |
0.0053 |
|
SW recruitment time |
MW recruitment |
-0.6936 |
<0.0001 |
|
SW recruitment time |
SW recruitment |
-0.5298 |
0.0031 |
|
MW recruitment time |
MW recruitment |
-0.4964 |
0.0116 |
|
MW recruitment time |
Mortality |
0.4008 |
0.0471 |
|
MW recruitment time |
SW recruitment time |
0.8359 |
<0,0001 |
62
More intriguing information
1. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity2. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
3. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers
4. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
5. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
6. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
7. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
8. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group
9. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
10. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry