The name is absent



Finally, when time periods are defined as the whole legislature in our panel
data, we also measure the length of the legislature, leg_length, in years, to control
for different durations of legislatures.

Economic and social variables To measure the overall size of government,
we rely on central government spending as a percent of GDP, cgexp, defined and
discussed in Persson and Tabellini (2003). This measure is based on data from the
IMF. Since government spending is affected by many other determinants, we also
control for several variables that reflect the economical, political, geographical,
and historical characteristics of the countries in the sample. These variables are
discussed and defined more extensively in Persson and Tabellini (2003). Some
of them are only used in the cross-sectional estimates, some only in the panel
estimates, some in both.

The following variables refer to economic and social determinants of fiscal pol-
icy or of political outcomes: openness to international trade, measured as exports
plus imports over GDP (trade), population size measured in logs (lpop), the per-
centage of the population above 65 years of age (prop65), the log of real per capita
income (lyp), the output gap (ygap
), measured as the log-deviation of output from
the country specific trend, a measure of ethno-linguistic fractionalization (avelf).
These variables have been shown to correlate with measures of fiscal policy in pre-
vious studies, such as Cameron (1978), Rodrik (1998), and Persson and Tabellini
(2003).

To measure the influence of colonial history, and since many majoritarian
countries are also former British colonies, we typically control for British colonial
origin. Because the influence of colonial heritage is likely to fade with time,
we weigh colonial origin by the time since independence, giving more weight to
colonial history in young independent states and no weight at all to colonial rule
more than 250 years ago. The colonial history variable is called col_uka.

Finally, since spending refers to central government, we also use an indicator
variable for federal political structures (f ederal).

The results reported below are very robust to alternative specifications of these
control variables. To save on degrees of freedom, we generally include these con-
trols only when they are statistically significant, or when we have strong priors
that they really belong to the specification.

Preliminary inspection of the data Table 1 displays means and standard
deviations of the main variables of interest, in the three types of electoral sys-
36



More intriguing information

1. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
2. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
3. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
10. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
11. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
12. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
13. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly
14. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
15. The name is absent
16. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
17. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
18. The name is absent
19. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
20. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods