Appendix
Proof of Proposition 1. As in Diamond (1980), the Lagrangian associated with the opti-
mal tax problem is
L(c(n), b, λ; r) =
n∙n p
nm
`n
+λ
∙m* (c(n),b,r)
u
m(n)
ρm(n)
(c(n), m)f (m, n)dm +
m* (c(n),b,r)
-m*(c(n),b,r)
m(n)
u(b, r)f (m, n)dm dn
(A.1)
ρm(n)
[n - c(n)]f (m, n)dm -
m* (c(n),b,r)
bf (m, n)dm dn - R
The first-order condition with respect to c (n) yields:
∙m(n)
1—
1 ∂u (c (n) , m)
m*(c(n),b,r) _
= [n - c(n) + b]
λ ∂c (n)
∂m* (c (n) , b, r)
∂c (n)
f(m, n)dm
f (m*,n).
(A.2)
Using (5) and (6), and dividing both sides by F(m*,n), (A.2) can be rewritten as
1 „М -WWdm* (c(n) ,b,r) f (m*,n)
(A.3)
1 - g(n) = τ (n) ■ Fm ■
From (A.3) we see that τ(n) takes the sign of 1 - g(n) as stated in Proposition 1.
The first-order condition with respect to r is
≤0 ≤ 0, r ≥ 0 and r-τf- = 0.
∂r ∂r
(A.4)
Differentiating (A.1) yields:
∂L ∂u (b, r)
∂r ∂r
+λ Z
n n
?n pm(n)
f(m, n)dmdn
Jn Jm*(c(n),b,r)
n dm* (c (n) ,b,r) A∣AW∕* W
----------------[n — c (n) + b] f (m , n)dn.
∂r
(A.5)
By the Envelope Theorem, (A.5) provides the dW/dr that we display in (8).
13
More intriguing information
1. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach2. Unemployment in an Interdependent World
3. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
4. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
5. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
6. The name is absent
7. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
8. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
9. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
10. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?