Appendix
Proof of Proposition 1. As in Diamond (1980), the Lagrangian associated with the opti-
mal tax problem is
L(c(n), b, λ; r) =
n∙n p
nm
`n
+λ
∙m* (c(n),b,r)
u
m(n)
ρm(n)
(c(n), m)f (m, n)dm +
m* (c(n),b,r)
-m*(c(n),b,r)
m(n)
u(b, r)f (m, n)dm dn
(A.1)
ρm(n)
[n - c(n)]f (m, n)dm -
m* (c(n),b,r)
bf (m, n)dm dn - R
The first-order condition with respect to c (n) yields:
∙m(n)
1—
1 ∂u (c (n) , m)
m*(c(n),b,r) _
= [n - c(n) + b]
λ ∂c (n)
∂m* (c (n) , b, r)
∂c (n)
f(m, n)dm
f (m*,n).
(A.2)
Using (5) and (6), and dividing both sides by F(m*,n), (A.2) can be rewritten as
1 „М -WWdm* (c(n) ,b,r) f (m*,n)
(A.3)
1 - g(n) = τ (n) ■ Fm ■
From (A.3) we see that τ(n) takes the sign of 1 - g(n) as stated in Proposition 1.
The first-order condition with respect to r is
≤0 ≤ 0, r ≥ 0 and r-τf- = 0.
∂r ∂r
(A.4)
Differentiating (A.1) yields:
∂L ∂u (b, r)
∂r ∂r
+λ Z
n n
?n pm(n)
f(m, n)dmdn
Jn Jm*(c(n),b,r)
n dm* (c (n) ,b,r) A∣AW∕* W
----------------[n — c (n) + b] f (m , n)dn.
∂r
(A.5)
By the Envelope Theorem, (A.5) provides the dW/dr that we display in (8).
13
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach
3. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
4. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data
5. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
6. Trade Openness and Volatility
7. The name is absent
8. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
9. The name is absent
10. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia