References
Baik, K.H. (1999), Rent-Seeking Firms, Consumer Groups, and the Social Costs of
Monopoly. Economic Inquiry 37( 3), 542-554.
Baik, K.H. (1994), Effort Levels in Contests With Two Asymmetric Players.
Southern Economic Journal 61, 367-378.
Baye, M.R., Kovenock, D. and de Vries, C. (1993), Rigging the Lobbying Process:
An Application of the All-Pay Auction. American Economic Review, 83, 289-
294.
Bulow, J. Geanakoplos, J. and Klemprer, P. (1985), Multi-market Oligopoly:
Strategic Substitutes and Complements. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 488-
511.
Che, Y. and Gale, I. (1998), Caps on Political Lobbying, American Economic Review,
88, 643-651.
Dixit, A. (1987), Strategic Behavior in Contests, American Economic Review, 77(5),
891-898.
Ellingsen, T. (1991), Strategic buyers and the social cost of monopoly. American
Economic Review, 81(3), 648-657.
Epstein, G.S. and Nitzan, S. (2001a), Endogenous Public Policy, Politicization and
Welfare, Journal of Public Economic Theory, forthcoming.
Epstein, G.S. and Nitzan, S. (2001b), Stakes and Welfare in Rent-Seeking Contests,
Public Choice, forthcoming.
Fabella, R.V. (1995), The social cost of rent seeking under countervailing opposition
to distortionary transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 235-247.
Gradstein, M. (1995), Intensity of Competition, Entry and Entry Deterrence in Rent-
Seeking Contests. Economics and Politics 7, 79-91.
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1994), Protection for Sale. American Economic
Review 84, 833-850.
Hillman, A.L. (1989), The Political Economy of Protection. (Harwood Academic
Publishers: London).
Hillman, A.L. (1982), Declining Industries and Political-Support Protectionist
Motives. American Economic Review 72, 1180- 1187.
Hillman, A.L. and Riley, J.G. (1989), Politically Contestable Rents and Transfers.
Economics and Politics 1, 17-39.
22
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
3. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
4. The name is absent
5. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
6. The name is absent
7. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
8. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent