How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany



Poisson regression model:19

E[yi - exp(χiβ) χi] = E[exp(x0β)(ηi - 1)χi] = 0.

This condition holds as long as ηi is uncorrelated with the regressors x0i and
E(η
ix0i) = 1.20 Mullahy considers the case where E(ηix0i) 6= 1 and a vector
of instruments z
i0 of dimension 1 × P with P K is available such that
E(η
izi0) = 1. Then, the moment conditions

E[exp(-x0iβ)yi - 1zi0] = 0

can be used to consistently estimate the parameter vector β . We use Mul-
lahy’s approach with cross-sectional data under the assumption of endoge-
nous tax rates.

An alternative approach of addressing the problem of endogeneity arises
with panel data. Windmeijer (2006) discusses moment conditions that can
be used to estimate the parameter vector consistently allowing for correlation
between the individual effects and the regressors under different assumptions
about the exogeneity of the explanatory variables.

Define

yit = exp(x0itβ)exp(ηi)wit

= μitViWit

where i is an index for municipalities, and t = 1, ...T is an index for time with
T with denoting the maximum number of years of a municipality-specific time
series in the data. η
i is a time-invariant, unobservable, municipality-specific
component and w
it is a time-variant disturbance term. Notice that νi and
w
it are scaling factors for the municipality-specific mean. With the panel
data models, we allow that that E (x
itwit-τ) 6= 0 for τ 0, maintaining that
E(w
itνi) = 0, E(wit) = 1 (both of them for t = 1, ..., T) and E(wiswit) = 0
(for any s
6= t).

We apply Chamberlain’s (1992) quasi-differencing transformation to elim-
inate the multiplicative fixed effect ν
i . The quasi-differencing approach is
based on the following equation (see Windmeijer, 2006):

sit = yit


μit-ι
μit


- Vit-I = μit-1νi(wit - wit-1)


19 The Poisson maximum likelihood estimator solves the first-order conditions
P
in=1[yi - exp(x0iβ)]x0i = 0.

20Whenever a constant term is included in x0i , then E(ηi) = 1 can be assumed without
loss of generality (see Mullahy, 1997).

13



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
3. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
4. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
5. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
6. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
7. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
8. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
9. Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security
10. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The problem of anglophone squint
14. The name is absent
15. Achieving the MDGs – A Note
16. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
17. On the Relation between Robust and Bayesian Decision Making
18. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
19. The name is absent
20. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties